Does something need to be done about dogs?

sidimmu said:
Within respect, there is hundreds of posts from you, can you give us some more hints as to when this magical information was shared?
Been through at least the first 50 replies by you in here and seen no evidence relating to your solution.
Click to expand...
I'ts mainly just a combination of frothing/RSS/questioning others IQ with no solutions and making some point about licenses being licenses. Almost seems like Wizzkiddy levels of wind up.
 
Dis86 said:
The child wasn't killed. I don't get why you want to focus on one specific attack scenario to the exclusion of all others. That's very strange.
Click to expand...
I'm referring to that attack as at the time i posted that was the attack you'd posted about.

I've asked a straight forward question twice now, but you won't answer what you'd do to stop dog attacks? gotcha.

Edit: no i'm not searching this thread with 100s of replies and probably dozens by you. Even if i did, the info i find might be outdated by now. You're gonna post "search the thread" and that is a cop out. Show some conviction in your beliefs. Or are u afraid of something?
 
Last edited:
tyke_ said:
I'm referring to that attack as at the time i posted that was the attack you'd posted about.

I've asked a straight forward question twice now, but you won't answer what you'd do to stop dog attacks? gotcha.

Edit: no i'm not searching this thread with 100s of replies and probably dozens by you. Even if i did, the info i find might be outdated by now. You're gonna post "search the thread" and that is a cop out. Show some conviction in your beliefs. Or are u afraid of something?
Click to expand...

So...confused by the search function too? Too complex for you? Are you afraid of something?
 
Dis86 said:
So...confused by the search function too? Too complex for you? Are you afraid of something?
Click to expand...
No, none of us are confused, we are all wanting your solution.
I have been through the thread starters replies in here, spent far too long with it last night.
I could not find anything you have provided that is information relating to a solution.

Please provide information on where I can find this magical reply of yours so I can link it for everyone else to see and close out this nonsense.
I would like a post number or rough date of when you provided this information.

Again there is hundreds of posts from you in here, I think at this point its a bit of common courtesy to point us in the right direction, rather than saying "learn to use the forum".
 
Dis86 said:
You didnt try very hard, did you? 255, 260 and so on...
Click to expand...
Okay thank you, think everyone will see why I found it so hard to see them, as its not exactly what you are claiming, will link these back for reference for everyone else to see;

post#255
Dis86 said:
Far too much common sense.
Click to expand...
post#260
Dis86 said:
It will fund controls on those who cannot responsibly own one.
Click to expand...
#264
Dis86 said:
Totally agree. I've said it before on here. Need a licence to drive yet any moron can pop out unlimited kids.
Click to expand...
#282
Dis86 said:
Licenses are licenses. Apologies if your single digit IQ is struggling with that. I mean I literally can't make it any clearer really.
Click to expand...
So there we have it everyone, after the countless posts of nonsense, the solution is that dogs need licensing. Thats it, does not provide any details of how this will work, costs, what dogs should be licensed etc.
All you do after this is just refer to licenses over and over again, but then also contest the point of licenses later in your posts saying that it takes a ton of resource and any counter point all you have replied with over and over again is;
#299
Dis86 said:
So again...should we scrap driving licenses then?
Click to expand...
Thanks for the wonderful clarity on this whole discussion, not. You have provided absolutely sod all in regards to a solution outside of some woolly remarks.
Frankly this thread should be absolutely binned due to your behaviour and outright refusal to provide anything substantial to your own thread.
 
Last edited:
sidimmu said:
Okay thank you, think everyone will see why I found it so hard to see them, as its not exactly what you are claiming, will link these back for reference for everyone else to see;

post#255

post#260

#264

#282

So there we have it everyone, after the countless posts of nonsense, the solution is that dogs need licensing. Thats it, does not provide any details of how this will work, costs, what dogs should be licensed etc.
All you do after this is just refer to licenses over and over again, but then also contest the point of licenses later in your posts saying that it takes a ton of resource and any counter point all you have replied with over and over again is;
#299

Thanks for the wonderful clarity on this whole discussion, not. You have provided absolutely sod all in regards to a solution outside of some woolly remarks.
Frankly this thread should be absolutely binned due to your behaviour and outright refusal to provide anything substantial to your own thread.
Click to expand...

If only you had the integrity to show what those posts were in response to...
 
Dis86 said:
If only you had the integrity to show what those posts were in response to...
Click to expand...
I am not going back and linking half the forum of people who have responded, all users can click on the post and take it back to the post if they want to see for themselves. You should know this - "learn to use the forum".
You told me your post numbers of where you are providing a solution, I have gone back, found these posts, brought them in front of your face and thats your reply?

Weak.
 
Last edited:
sidimmu said:
I am not going back and linking half the forum of people who have responded, all users can click on the post and take it back to the post if they want to see for themselves. You should know this - "learn to use the forum".
You told me your post numbers of where you are providing a solution, I have gone back, found these posts, brought them in front of your face and thats your reply?

Weak.
Click to expand...

Lmao you're such a sad little angry man aren't you! You've put posts up without showing the context, which is key given the responses.
And yes, I have suggested a solution but never claimed it was perfect, hence pointing out some of the flaws. The whole point of the thread, if you had the ability to comprehend from the OP is asking what can be done. I wouldn't be asking that question if I had the answers, would I? Use your brain. And as I've said before, if you don't like the thread you can stop replying instead of crying.

Or do you hang around because of the guilt that you actually feel over children being torn to pieces?
 
Dis86 said:
Lmao you're such a sad little angry man aren't you! You've put posts up without showing the context, which is key given the responses.
And yes, I have suggested a solution but never claimed it was perfect, hence pointing out some of the flaws. The whole point of the thread, if you had the ability to comprehend from the OP is asking what can be done. I wouldn't be asking that question if I had the answers, would I? Use your brain. And as I've said before, if you don't like the thread you can stop replying instead of crying.
Click to expand...
You argue every point that is a counter as nonsense and wont work, yet your solution is not even a solution, its a woolly remark. Again, you told me your post numbers which would show your solution and point, I just bought them in here for a number of us who wanted your solution. Thanks for confirming you have no idea and no solution.

Dis86 said:
Or do you hang around because of the guilt that you actually feel over children being torn to pieces?
Click to expand...
No, I actively celebrate children getting ripped apart.
 
Last edited:
Dis86 said:
I don't really have one, hence the creation of this thread asking that question.
My preferred outcome is that people stop being killed and injured by dogs however. Particularly people in the street just going about their own business.
Click to expand...
Exactly, there isn’t a truly viable solution. Maybe ban a breed like the bully XL, but they’ll still exist and other dogs attack people.

It’s sad when it happens but some things are just the lottery of life
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom