Does something need to be done about dogs?

[ttaskmaster]

Back to not thinking? Where is your logic to that?

The fact that you wouldn't entertain any questioning of your proclamation.

Yeah it is the fault of the dog and the owner, both deserve punishing as a result, its really not hard to see.

You said nothing of the owner. You just wanted to punish the dog.

But you've got a hard on for allowing dangerous dogs to exist in society, which is why no one agrees with you.

Whereas you prefer to ignore what makes them dangerous and allow the people responsible to carry on making even more problems for the rest of us.
You also seem very keen on putting animals to death... I'm sure that's a psychological red flag in DSM5.

 

[Dis86]

Woman assaulted in Cotswolds after asking dog walkers to use lead

The woman says she was pulled the ground and kicked in the ribs while walking in the Cotswolds.

www.bbc.co.uk

Another day another story about dogs and their owners!

 

[sidimmu]

You said nothing of the owner. You just wanted to punish the dog.

The owner gets punished too, I dont know if you can read but it said that in my previous reply.

Whereas you prefer to ignore what makes them dangerous and allow the people responsible to carry on making even more problems for the rest of us.

Oh the people, the people you cant ever change, but you can control what they have access to.
We've been through this countless times now, you refuse to actively listen and engage brain. But you cant see any problem with having murder dogs available to buy to the scum of the country.

You also seem very keen on putting animals to death... I'm sure that's a psychological red flag in DSM5.

Well context is king and you have chosen to bring zero context of my previous reply through and instead insist I have a fascination with putting animals to death. Grow up.
There is nothing wrong with putting a killer, to death. But you'll contest the hell out of this because of something pathetic, whilst still providing zero effective measures to control. Nice one.

 

[ttaskmaster]

The owner gets punished too, I dont know if you can read but it said that in my previous reply.

You mentioned it after I highlighted its absence, sure... but it was not part of your agenda to begin with.

Oh the people, the people you cant ever change, but you can control what they have access to.

So when are you banning kitchen knives and hand tools, then?
With all the other bans, those are the implements most commonly used for crimes, and often purchased en-route to said deed. Why aren't you controlling their access to these things?

So explain why you're not locking up the owners of these dogs, instead of just fining them a few quid and then letting them go get another one?
Explain why you're doing nothing active to stop the bad breeding of unsuitable dogs in the first place?

But you cant see any problem with having murder dogs available to buy to the scum of the country.

They're not available. They're banned. It's illegal to have them. The problem is solved. Rejoice!!
Just like with Pit Bulls......

Well context is king and you have chosen to bring zero context of my previous reply through and instead insist I have a fascination with putting animals to death. Grow up.

"Dog does bad, kill dog. No question".
That was the context of your response. Not a single mention of humans being accountable and not even the slightest possibility of considering extenuating circumstances.

There is nothing wrong with putting a killer, to death.

And yet death penalties have been consistently proven flawed and ineffective... You're flogging a dead horse at this point, which seems quite fitting given your earlier responses.

But you'll contest the hell out of this because of something pathetic

The law is pathetic, now?

If a person's dog worries livestock that person is guilty of an offence... not the dog, the person.

At the end of the day, livestock is property of value and the law treats it as such, just as it treats your dog as property.
Your property damages the property of the farmer, you pay for the damage. That's all there is to it.

whilst still providing zero effective measures to control. Nice one.

I've provided plenty of options and points for discussion. You're just not interested because they require money (also covered) and effort greater than signing a piece of paper.