Yes, it could. The responsible owners would have to cough up. But its the irresponsible owners who are the problem.
Taxes fund prisons, courts and the police.
Yes, it could. The responsible owners would have to cough up. But its the irresponsible owners who are the problem.
The topic here is about problem dogs. A licence fee won't fix that.
Far more children are injured/killed by their own parents each year, bring in licences for breeding, there's lots of folk out there that are far too stupid to be left in charge of children, some of them shouldn't be left in charge of a goldfish...
I agree. And I already made that point to dowie.
Please stick to the topic.
It's a completely different topic. Don't you understand that?
Motor vehicles are not dogs. Stick to the topic.
I think you are taking the pish. And being offensive.
That's pretty low IQ posting tbh. Fishing license is totally different to a driving license. The consequences of getting it wrong, the prospect of getting caught, etc.
You can see his point though right? In order to be alowed to use a potentially dangerous peice of equipment in public you must undertake basic training or pass a test proving you are capable of doing so safely.
A dog is certainly a potentialy dangerous peice of equipment, biological rather than mechanical, but used in industry, law enforcement and military sectors too. Undergoing compulsary basic training or passing a test before being in charge of one in public would be a good idea.
Especially as say lack of maintainence harms a dog much more than it does a car or a 125cc
And how does paying 17 quid online and getting a piece of paper do any of that?
A responsible owner would know what the dog needs - what ever restraints are requited without the need for a licence. The irresponsible owners wouldn't one anyway.
The argument was licenses are licenses. I don't doubt they can put in effect and lead to the benefits you are saying (driving licenses), but the poster who said licenses won't work because those who disobey will disobey regardless is totally true.
welcome to OCUK 2022
I *feel* it therefore *it must be*
Because
However your low IQ argument + ad hominem was:
c'mon man, even for you
What point where you making then?
Responsible dog owners don't require a licence. Irresponsible owners don't care. That's it in a nutshell.
lol, dude
Drivers licenses = no
Fishing licenses = who GAF, literally achieves nothing
Ah yes what a slam dunk argument. Literally zero gun crime in the US because of licenses