Because they're proper boxers.
Also he was born before the 'law' came in.![]()

why do they dock the tails on boxers? purely cosmetic or is there some old reason from when they used to work?

Yeah, as cruel as it is, it's weird for me to see a boxer with a full length tail![]()
why do they dock the tails on boxers? purely cosmetic or is there some old reason from when they used to work?
Here we go, people who have no idea on what 'dcoking' involves quote it as 'cruel'.
Docking is done at around the 3-5 day old stage, while the pups still have not opened their eyes. The tails are either 'snipped off' or tied off to stop blood flow. It really does not hurt them.
Anyway they are 'working dogs', mine spend a lot of time dragging logs about the forest, go camping with me, protect the house and live in and outside. They are kept for and do have a use.
Why has legislation changed if it isn't cruel?

I don't have first hand experience so I'm not about to go all Daily Mail about it, but it seems to me depriving a dog of a means of expression for what these days is nothing more than our wants is still cruel - even if it is painless/humane for them (I remain to be convinced at this point, but as I say don't have any first hand experience)
Working dogs can still be docked. It's especially important for springer spaniels as they do crash through brush when they're working, simply because they're so enthusiastic. They can damage or seriously injure their tail quite badly whilst doing this, so it's in their interests to have it done.
If the dog is kept as a pet, then there's no necessity in my humble opinion to dock. Personally I am against docking for purely cosmetic reasons.