Anything else @4K8KW10?
I think you missed this question;
MiSJAH said:
Or are you just doing a poor job at trollin'?
DON'T BUY MSI THEY MIS-SOLD TOP SPEC GT SERIES LAPTOPS with MXM Graphics
- Thread starter MiSJAH
- Start date
Anything else @4K8KW10?
I think you missed this question;
Or are you just doing a poor job at trollin'?
It is just your twisted vision making things look like the way they are not.
It is like there is a big global evil witch that spelled an evil magic and many of you are under its influence.
What's your objective here?
This is mine;
MSI claimed:
Then claimed
MSI UK Notebook said:
Along with
MSI UK Notebook said:
Source for above quotes:
Now here's where MSI are taking the mick out of their customers, the actual upgrade of GPU's is an option. They lied as a cash grab to make people buy new rather than make a smaller profit on just a GPU upgrade.
How do I know this, I hear you ask.
Well let's see what MSI's VAR's are offering:
That's right, the very upgrade MSI claimed wasn't possible.
This was a huge effort by MSI to cash grab as much as they could from high ticket value customers.
So @4K8KW10 can you demonstrate another gaming notebook manufacturer that has behaved in a similar manner or do you now understand why this thread (and the lawsuit) exists?
Also, if you please could make an effort to try and answer questions posed to you:
MiSJAH said:
(Thanks for bumping my thread too bro).
"And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light."
Last edited:
Simply because it pushes this thread to the top of the board and those unaware of the situation may read from the most recent page.
They didn't lie, you are just being too rude, I think.
You can claim that they didn't deliver according to their initial plans, not more.
Actually, I said it - the suit against will fail
Thanks for bumping the post again bud.
Watch the video posted above. MSI claim the 9 series GPU will be upgradable or 2 further generations in the GT72/GT80 chassis.
Then MSI claimed this was not possible.
Which of the above statements is not a lie?
Pascal GPU's are drop in replacements.
MSI claimed it was not stable to use the MXM Pascal cards.
It is.
It has been demonstrated by users here that have upgraded and by the above company.
And yes, they upgraded to an MSI manufactured Pascal card.
The first person to perform the upgrade (AFAIK) simply took the Pascal card from a GT73 and retrofitted it into his GT72.
It is.
It has been demonstrated by users here that have upgraded and by the above company.
And yes, they upgraded to an MSI manufactured Pascal card.
The first person to perform the upgrade (AFAIK) simply took the Pascal card from a GT73 and retrofitted it into his GT72.
Which aspect do you think wasn't a lie?
When they claimed that the laptops had upgradeable graphics cards or when they claimed the laptops did not have upgradeable graphics cards.
They have made both of these statements, they both cannot be truth. So which one is the lie?
It was an intentional act.
The lie was that is was that the upgrade required a new display among other things:
The date MSI released the above statement was 30/11/16, they had already released the GT73 with the GTX 10 series graphics cards.
The image above is from a US based MSI VAR (value added reseller).
They are performing the upgrade using MSI components that are exactly the same as GT73's cooling and graphics cards (this is what you received in earlier MXM upgrade kits).
MSI's R&D dept has a larger budget than a single VAR, and certainly more than an individual user that has managed the same solution.
If you still want to claim MSI had no intent to mislead, how would anyone be able to achieve the upgrade using solely MSI manufactured components?
The lie was that is was that the upgrade required a new display among other things:
UK Pascal Trade-Upgrade Program said:
The date MSI released the above statement was 30/11/16, they had already released the GT73 with the GTX 10 series graphics cards.
The image above is from a US based MSI VAR (value added reseller).
They are performing the upgrade using MSI components that are exactly the same as GT73's cooling and graphics cards (this is what you received in earlier MXM upgrade kits).
MSI's R&D dept has a larger budget than a single VAR, and certainly more than an individual user that has managed the same solution.
If you still want to claim MSI had no intent to mislead, how would anyone be able to achieve the upgrade using solely MSI manufactured components?
If you don't care, why reply?
What higher level testing do you think they need for a plug and play cooling and graphics card solution?
Let's stop being vague.
You are aware they already had all of that information as they had the pascal cards in their new line up, the GT73/83?
But prior to the claim that the GT72/80 series were not upgradeable.
That said ... take off the tin-foil hat, and wash off the aroma of crazy.
No tin foil hat.
MSI had to do the research on Pascal GPU's for their new line that incorporated them. Hardly conspiracy theory central, is it?
I'm not sure if you have read all 65 pages of this thread.
MSI had all the information prior to claiming the MXM upgrade would not work.
It does work.
That's pretty simple.
The VAR above is MSI's largest authorised in the USA. Forum etiquette does not allow the mentioning of competitors, however a simple google search will provide you with the results.
The upgrade provided by them is an MSI MXM GTX 1070 and the MSI GT73 cooling system. As per previous posts both of these were available when MSI claimed the upgrade would result in unsatisfactory display.
Anything else?
The upgrade provided by them is an MSI MXM GTX 1070 and the MSI GT73 cooling system. As per previous posts both of these were available when MSI claimed the upgrade would result in unsatisfactory display.
hacktrix2006 said:
Anything else?