• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

DOOM benchmark Result Thread.

its not about the vram ingame its because AMD doesnt support open gl properly in doom and they wont be updating the drivers.

so if you have a 295x2 with doom you sat using half a card.which is pretty crap.also crossfire.
 
BluesFanUK said:
... and yet people still tell you a 980ti isn't good enough for 4K. Nutters.
Click to expand...

The majority of the high end cards are fine with 4k once you disable all the crap that lowers IQ such as motion blur, chromatic aberration, lens flare, depth of field etc.
 
Last edited:
~>Dg<~ said:
its not about the vram ingame its because AMD doesnt support open gl properly in doom and they wont be updating the drivers.

so if you have a 295x2 with doom you sat using half a card.which is pretty crap.also crossfire.
Click to expand...

Previous ID engine games didn't support Xfire, don't think they ever will.

Can't find a clear answer about iD Tech 6.
 
Last edited:
I've not been able to find out anywhere if Vulkan will bring multiple card support to Doom, since it provides a method to do away with the need for crossfire. I'm managing 45fps, dipping to 30fps using crossfire 7950's (therefore only one card in use), at 1440p with a mix of medium and high settings.
 
BluesFanUK said:
... and yet people still tell you a 980ti isn't good enough for 4K. Nutters.
Click to expand...

Any gpu can do 4K in less demanding games so your point is moot. Doom is a corridor shooter where view distance is limited most of the time so the top end cards can come close to 60fps when certain settings are lowered. Try an open world game such as Witcher 3 and the 980ti/TitanX will get around 30 fps @ 4K.

So if you want 4K 60fps in the majority of games then a single 980ti will not cut it I'm afraid.
 
Mauller said:
Still appears to be some performance issues there, a 960 should be nowhere near a 290.

Can't wait for the vulkan patch, it should be very interesting to see the performance difference.
Click to expand...

Yep i think there is something off with those results. The 390 is a good match for the 290x due to clocks a little like my 290pcs+ and is 10% slower in this game. It could be due to OpenGl so i am also looking forward to Vulkan.
 
Those results are way off even assuming there is a problem with certain AMD cards - some cards (both AMD and nVidia) where the only difference between the models is clockspeed are 40% different when in all other games it is like 10 maybe 15% (which matches the expected performance differential for the clockspeed).
 
Lokken86 said:
Interesting that the gtx780 is being beaten by the 960.
Click to expand...

Look at the performance difference between the 780 and the 780ti :O

For some reason benchmarkers seem to persist on using what looks like some really ropey 780s that can't be boosting over about 950-970MHz or so probably their original review samples which doesn't reflect what most people will see with a 780.

That said my 780 isn't holding up the best in the game at 2560x1440 with all settings maxed lol!
 
Marine-RX179 said:
You sound surprised ;)

Looking forward to seeing 980Ti's performance after Nvidia released 1070/1080 :p
Click to expand...

Any driver based gimping on Nvidias part will show up in DX12 and Vulkan based games. If the difference is near the same in DX11/OGL to DX12/Vulkan then there is not much if any gimping going on.

The entire layout of the cards should change when the vulkan patch drops and they should line up in the places where they should be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom