• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Doom Vulkan vs Open GL performance

Lokken86 said:
I'd still like to do our own video comparisons for fun. 4k should be close. That's the one I'm most interested in since 1080p and 1440p were really fast even before.
Click to expand...

My challenge is on anytime any day. I know i will beat your benchmark ,however, it is just matter of time when you post.
 
Dygaza said:
Digitalfoundry's benches show decent improvements on nvidia aswell..
Click to expand...

on vulkan both AMD and Nvidia are gaining. AMD is gaining much more ,however, Nvidia Sean said that they are due with Game Ready so see lets what kind of performance improvement that brings.
 
Last edited:
Nvidia 368.69 is for Doom Vulkan.

Game Ready driver will launch this week according to Nvidia ,however, it is not confirm that it is for Doom Vulkan or other game.
 
Dygaza said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIlWdMjpa54

Great video showing gains on 1080. Some part it's a bit slower than ogl, but then gets nice boost. Kinda shows that people just have to look for areas that are hard for cpu, and there are gains for nvidia users. And that is with very good cpu.


Gregster didn't get gains, but would be nice to see him testing this same area (if he has savegame there).
Click to expand...

Vulkan> DX12.

Both AMD and Nvidia are getting gains on Vulkan. However, on DX12 only one party wins.
 
Last edited:
Doom Vulkan SMAA vs TSSAA on GTX 980 TI @ 1080p ,Ultra settings

TSSAA
86821ef959.png

SMAA
8682fa6560.png

SMAA also reduces Nvidia performance compare to TSSAA on Vulkan.
 
RanxZy said:
Kepler NVIDIA hardware getting absolutely murdered by AMD's GCN cards. NVIDIA will finally be seriously challenged if big boy Vega comes within the next 6 months and they still get miniscule gains with Pascal under Vulkan. They have an early warning of what AMD is capable of in the latest API. Now imagine the 480 had double the shaders/bandwidth running Vulkan.
Click to expand...

GTX 980 Ti OC is easily beating Fury X OC in Doom Vulkan. Fury X has 4096 shader, which also has a advantage of async and still getting trumped by a GTX 980 Ti OC.

There is a reason why AMD did not invest on high end market this year and went for mid to low range market.
 
Dygaza said:
I don't really see 980Ti OC beating Fury X OC in DOOM, difference is just simply too big to be catched. It will be closer though.

AMD's reason is fairly simple. High end card with GDDR5 memory would have been way too inefficient, and there's just simply not enough GDDR5x memory for both parties available. And HBM2 ain't ready yet. If tech allowed earlier, I'm pretty sure we would have had AMD high end cards already aswell.
Click to expand...

Each benchmark is done on same settings as Fury X and Radeon Pro duo.
Fury X
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfTjDbR7vvI

GTX 980 Ti

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mydOD1321Ag


Fury X
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaJMzoS1ZHI

GTX 980 Ti
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNZby5eF2kM

Radeon Pro duo @ 1172/545Mhz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9vUYsS1yNY

GTX 980 Ti
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDYp1VEOn54

However, Shadow play cause 10% performance hit.
 
Lokken86 said:
It was a joke. Comon lighten up a little.

Oh and cheers for the vid. Your 1080 is about 5%-10% faster than my result I would say.

Oh and Matt what software did you use to record I cant get anything to work.
Click to expand...

You can just post the screenshot. I would love to compare with you and If you do then please just post the screenshot of first level UAC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom