Dr. Disrespect permanently banned from Twitch

Can't see the post but is this the same NickMercs who talks about Morals then contunies to push/promote/ram gambling sites/codes down minors throats every 30 seconds on his streams?

Nice guy.
Not sure how he normally acts or behaves tbh, hadn't heard of the guy until I saw the tweet doing the rounds.

What did nick say?

If I was a mod I would make it a bannable offense to tease information that can be easily provided.

Sorry wasn't meant as a time, at work so didn't have the time before to did the tweet out. He said...

"This ****** Dr Disrespect is married with children, pushin’ 40. Admits to texting a minor inappropriately. His words, not mine. So I cut ties, because obviously that’s inexcusable. Now I’m a **** friend for not having his back??? Buncha brain-rot morons on this app."

I would link directly but he uses naughty words.... I not calling people brain-rot morons but he has a point about its not excusable for a grown married man with kids to be texting a minor yet people are willing to give him a pass and even throw their money at him.
 
Last edited:
These streamers are not friends lol. They are colleagues.

Of course they will drop each other in a heartbeat if there is even a remote chance of financial harm. They even throw each other under the bus for clout.
 
Last edited:
Not sure how he normally acts or behaves tbh, hadn't heard of the guy until I saw the tweet doing the rounds.



Sorry wasn't meant as a time, at work so didn't have the time before to did the tweet out. He said...

"This ****** Dr Disrespect is married with children, pushin’ 40. Admits to texting a minor inappropriately. His words, not mine. So I cut ties, because obviously that’s inexcusable. Now I’m a **** friend for not having his back??? Buncha brain-rot morons on this app."

I would link directly but he uses naughty words.... I not calling people brain-rot morons but he has a point about its not excusable for a grown married man with kids to be texting a minor yet people are willing to give him a pass and even throw their money at him.
Nickmercs plays video games on the Internet.

What age does he think his audience is and does he talk to them appropriately for that age?
 
so my understanding at the moment :
1) we still dont know the age of the person involved
2) we dont know were the person resided at the time of the incient
3) we dont know the content of any messages exchanges
4) we dont know what type of inappropriate messages were exchanges (sexting / Jokes / inside views / inside business practices / advise / ect)
5) the issue was originally escalated to authorities who did not persue any legal actions after review.
6) a legal case was taken and a mutual agreed outcome was reached between Twitch and Dr D
7) unclear if original "victim" was involve in the legal proceedings
8) an ex-twitch employee with out all the relavent information leaked information, with the current aimed out come unclear (legal justice / defamation / some one believing they are doing the correct legal thing).
9) a x/twiter post was made by some one, and edited by some one (unclear who or if multiple people have access to the x/twitter account).
10) unclear if there are current legal actions between Dr D and other parties (twitch / Kody / ?)
11) Twitch and Dr D did not part on good terms
12) siveral incidents with Dr D and Twitch staff/twitch con created a "rift"
13) the intentions to meet up with some one at twitch con is unclear and so far neither confirmed or denieyable
14) intentions to persons under the age are unclear.
15) we (the collective) are saying its ok to talk to people above legal age.

does this sound about right?

Cba to read all 80+ pages, can someone just tell me if this dude is kiddie fiddler or not?

I think LostCorpse's quote sums it up best.
Seems to boil down to him initially admitting to it and then saying he didn't whilst some believe and continue to worship and others are more sceptical
 
i was going to say Elizabeth Mary-Kate Olsen but the age gap isnt quiet as large as i thought. but there was an aspect of Safeguardingand position of power at the time i feel.

What age does he think his audience is and does he talk to them appropriately for that age?
well no one is accusing him. thats the real differance.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom