• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Dragon Age Inquisition Performance Benchmarks

shankly1985 said:
Go right ahead, because I have made it very big on here about frame latency and how Mantle is a smoother gaming experience.

I have never once said it's because of the min frame rate.
Click to expand...

Frame latency and FPS are two of the same, didn't Andy already go into detail with you on this?

I would search for your mumblings, will be too busy tonight playing this game knowing my minimum FPS is higher than yours :D
 
Tonester0011 said:
Frame latency and FPS are two of the same, didn't Andy already go into detail with you on this?

I would search for your mumblings, will be too busy tonight playing this game knowing my minimum FPS is higher than yours :D
Click to expand...

There not the same thing and if you really want to learn something go and read back what I posted showing why there not the same thing and you'll see. I even tuck screenshots and compared it to the frame latency I was getting and they was not the same results.

Go right ahead and find that thread and we continue this on there OK? Or I guess you just say I have no time bah, bah
 
Gregster said:
But he isn't and he is spot on.
Click to expand...

He's not, Frame Rates are not the be all and end all of latency, its constancy of fame rendering, if your reading 60 FPS it does not mean every frame is rendered at a time frame of 16.6 ms, the end result is measured in averages.

The only way to tell what Latency you're actually getting is to read the Frame time individually.

Mantle has better latency not just because it it boost Min FPS where the CPU is the bottleneck but also because it stitches the frames together better than DX.

Look at the recorded frame times here, the Green line (DX CF) is the one with erratic frame times.



This one is AMD vs Nvidia in DX, they have the same frame latency.



@ Tonester0011 i thought you said you weren't serious about a 0.2 Frame rate difference, i'm confused, why are you still banging on about it?
 
Last edited:
4 old stock Titans using the same settings as before

4 Titans @837/1502

1080p
TLjEaIw.png



1600p
Vla5Jwa.png



4K
IbNDeZP.png
 
Tonester0011 said:
SLI 980s got a better score than quad Titans at 4k?
Guessing your usage was pretty dire.
Click to expand...

No, 4 way 980s got a worse score than the Titans @4K lol

Just run the game maxed out to see what the VRAM usage is @4K

FvjCPTA.jpg


Another few mbs and it would have hit the buffer on the Titans.:eek:
 
Kaapstad said:
The problem for the 4gb cards I think is all the VRAM it uses (and the game still looks very average).

I think the 8gb 290Xs will be good on this.

The 980s @1080p stock do something like 132fps 4 up and beat the Titans easy but @4K the Titans come out on top.
Click to expand...

Yeah this title seems to want more GPU power it would seem.. That isn't a bad thing either pushing PC hardware is what we want..

How does the game look and bench when you dont use the max texture setting?
 
shankly1985 said:
Yeah this title seems to want more GPU power it would seem.. That isn't a bad thing either pushing PC hardware is what we want..

How does the game look and bench when you dont use the max texture setting?
Click to expand...

I have not tried it on lower settings yet but it does not look very good on the max settings.:)
 
Kaapstad said:
I have not tried it on lower settings yet but it does not look very good on the max settings.:)
Click to expand...

I have to agree. All the demo's I have seen don't look anything special to me. I am not dissing the game but it just doesn't llok that great if I am honest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom