Do you have any sources to back up anything you said there?
What part? Most of it is common knowledge and can be found on wikipedias drug testing article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_test
Do you have any sources to back up anything you said there?
Drug tests are pointless, they can only test for a small minority of drugs with long half lives and only give positive or negative results which results in good employees not under the effect of drugs being fired which then results in reduced productivity and an increased cost to the business, as well as a bad reputation for the company and a reduction in the number of job applications because people don't want to work for a company where they will get fired. In addition to that, the high false positive rate means many people who have not taken drugs are fired. Widespread drugs testing results in a trend towards the production and use of shorter acting drugs in my observations, which are undetectable.
Even that doesn't list some medications that are prescribeable.![]()
What part? Most of it is common knowledge and can be found on wikipedias drug testing article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_test
Very worrying.
Which industry do they serve?
I've bolded the bits of your claim that need some sources. To me, your post was confusing. You claimed that "good employees" who "aren't under the effects of drugs" are going to get fired for failing drugs tests.
Seems odd to say the least.