Dyslexia

:rolleyes:

Calling me stupid isnt going to get you anywhere. I am simply of the belief that dyslexia as a disorder doesnt really exsist. There are many people, even some experts and psychologists, that share the same view

There are also people that claim the halocaust never happened. You beleive them too?
 
not true. dyslexics brain doesnt actually process the difrence. especialy subtle ones. like ie ei le el etc. when you read over it your read it as the right way round, also words that sound the same but have difrent spelling are a nightmare.

The problem with this is not just with letters. numbers are often read the wrong way round. infact when i read 2 digit number i normaly read the back 2 front.

i still dont understand the i before e rule. It should be thier not their lol.
 
not true. dyslexics brain doesnt actually process the difrence. especialy subtle ones. like ie ei le el etc. when you read over it your read it as the right way round, also words that sound the same but have difrent spelling are a nightmare.

The problem with this is not just with letters. numbers are often read the wrong way round. infact when i read 2 digit number i normaly read the back 2 front.

Then you are not reading, you are skimming lazily over something. i miss ie's and ei's the wrong way round if I just read stuff too quickly. Just stop and look at it for more than a split second.
 
i still dont understand the i before e rule. It should be thier not their lol.

i before e except after c unless it's some weird deity..... easy.
only use an apostrophe (') between a t and an s if there is something missing such as you're = you are, it's = it is
they're = they are
their has an I in it therefore relates to people
there has an re in it like aREa so relates to a place
as in they're stood over there with their dog.

not taking the p, just a few basic rules.
 
Last edited:
:rolleyes:

Calling me stupid isnt going to get you anywhere. I am simply of the belief that dyslexia as a disorder doesnt really exsist. There are many people, even some experts and psychologists, that share the same view

you can find experts to back up anything!!! just because there are experts to back stuff up doesnt mean its reall/not reall. ill find you experts to back up ghosts are real. what really matters is the facts towards the argument. and if you cant provide any or disprove the facts already prosented you dont really have a leg to stand on. Try find some on this imformation your on about and prosent it. I will read it not dissmiss it without reding it as i am interested.
 
Then you are not reading, you are skimming lazily over something. i miss ie's and ei's the wrong way round if I just read stuff too quickly. Just stop and look at it for more than a split second.

How can you possibly claim such things. You go find some true dislexics and ask how good their proof reading is. You cant say that unless you have been diagnosed a dyslexic and can do it that way.
 
you can find experts to back up anything!!! just because there are experts to back stuff up doesnt mean its reall/not reall. ill find you experts to back up ghosts are real. what really matters is the facts towards the argument. and if you cant provide any or disprove the facts already prosented you dont really have a leg to stand on. Try find some on this imformation your on about and prosent it. I will read it not dissmiss it without reding it as i am interested.

So, so far i have had the Holocaust and Ghosts used as analogies. :rolleyes:
 
I was referring to you bringing up the holocaust actually.

It was a valid point. Just becuase someone says dislexia doesn't exist, doesn't mean they are right. Doesn't mean there is a shred of truth in their findings. Just means they got paid a lot to say it just like global warming, peoplegetting paid loads to do research and all that.
 
You mean the guy that got £20,000+ Allowance 2007-2008
and got Incidental Expenses Provision of £18,000+

Oh OK you belive him pfff

Are you suggesting that his views on dyslexia are wrong because he abused the expenses system? That seems like a non-sequitur.
 
Then you are not reading, you are skimming lazily over something. i miss ie's and ei's the wrong way round if I just read stuff too quickly. Just stop and look at it for more than a split second.

It isn't a case of being lazy, unless you consider spending around 2 hours proof-reading 2 written sides of A4 being particuarly lazy. Sadly, it's just one of my (very few :p) weak points.
 
Back
Top Bottom