2 May 2009 at 17:58 #21 nolimit nolimit Associate OP Joined 20 Aug 2003 Posts 2,446 Location London Not tried aperture but with lightroom and photoshop it runs very fast.
2 May 2009 at 21:33 #22 Rooky007 Rooky007 Soldato Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 3,635 nolimit said: Not tried aperture but with lightroom and photoshop it runs very fast. Click to expand... Thanks for letting me know. Hmmm wonder if apple store calling for me tmr at meadowhall
nolimit said: Not tried aperture but with lightroom and photoshop it runs very fast. Click to expand... Thanks for letting me know. Hmmm wonder if apple store calling for me tmr at meadowhall
3 May 2009 at 00:10 #23 nolimit nolimit Associate OP Joined 20 Aug 2003 Posts 2,446 Location London why don't go to the apple store and try out some photo and video editing.
3 May 2009 at 11:11 #24 Rooky007 Rooky007 Soldato Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 3,635 Trouble is the apple store does not have Aperture preloaded on their imacs which I dont understand why. But what I am wondering whould I see a much improve performance over the new iMac 2.66 over my 2 years old MacBook Pro 2.16?
Trouble is the apple store does not have Aperture preloaded on their imacs which I dont understand why. But what I am wondering whould I see a much improve performance over the new iMac 2.66 over my 2 years old MacBook Pro 2.16?
3 May 2009 at 13:02 #25 nolimit nolimit Associate OP Joined 20 Aug 2003 Posts 2,446 Location London I havn't used old MacBook Pro so I couldn't tell you how much improvement you will see.
