That's an extreme scenario that I have never seen happen so I wouldn't be basing rules on it.
I'm fairly sure I've been told on here before (possibly by Baz I can't remember) that going down is fine to alert the ref to a foul.
Didn't I say already that he gets caught by an arm? He wasn't elbowed and his reaction was well ott and as per my last post, had this been a one off then you could give him the benefit of the doubt but it wasn't. He regularly goes down, screaming like a child, claiming he's been elbowed or hit when he clearly hadn't been. He's a cheat.Wait so he was hit or wasn't?
What about going down holding your face like you just took one square on the nose from Mike Tyson when someones arm bashes your ear?I'm fairly sure I've been told on here before (possibly by Baz I can't remember) that going down is fine to alert the ref to a foul.
Feigning injury and not attempting to stay on your feet when you're being foule aren't the same thing though are they?I'm fairly sure I've been told on here before (possibly by Baz I can't remember) that going down is fine to alert the ref to a foul.
Didn't I say already that he gets caught by an arm? He wasn't elbowed and his reaction was well ott and as per my last post, had this been a one off then you could give him the benefit of the doubt but it wasn't. He regularly goes down, screaming like a child, claiming he's been elbowed or hit when he clearly hadn't been. He's a cheat.
nooooo. should do better
More or less ridiculous than holding your nose after getting bashed in the ear?being caught by an arm is not getting hit by an arm. Ok, how ******* ridiculous![]()
Come on Shami, lets not play dumb. It's very simple. He was caught but his reaction was ott but had he not had a history of cheating then maybe you give him the benefit of the doubt.Does not compute.
Come on Shami, lets not play dumb. It's very simple. He was caught but his reaction was ott but had he not had a history of cheating then maybe you give him the benefit of the doubt.