Associate
^^ April 2013.... If I'd been 18 months earlier it would be 50p+ a unit DOH!
My boss gets that rate. Long since paid for his panels.^^ April 2013.... If I'd been 18 months earlier it would be 50p+ a unit DOH!
My boss gets that rate. Long since paid for his panels.
So you think wages have dragged up the cost of energy?No it isnt, what utter drivel.
Well I inherited mine so it’s pure profit for me but I chose to fund my battery using the fit payments.Same, all paid for itself now, plan to use the FIT payment now to fund self build Batteries.
Slight hiccup this year....the inverter died, it will be 800 to replace .
Yeah its discriminatory only offering that tariff to EV customers, that is a huge barrier to entry that benefits more wealthy people.Just switched over to Octopus but they wouldn't let me go onto the Octopus Go tariff without having an EV, he even went to go and triple check but came back an answer was no. Have swapped onto their variable (from bulb, currently also on variable) as I think they're a good company anyway. Bit miffed you are only allowed to go on amazing fixed tariff (40p day 7.5p night fixed for 12 months) if you're fortunate enough to own an EV already. Variable likely to be 54p day and 38p night come October
We can adopt what Spain or France do.Yes includes. So move the variable bit onto unit costs and keep the fixed (although fixed is difficult to truly identify depending on time period, they are often stepped costs)
I'm not against that, but anyone with more than a couple of brain cells will look at that (terrible attempt that looks like it was knocked up in 5 minutes in a brainstorming event, I mean why the random / after points, why the . between points 2 and 3) and say, all these points benefit OVO as opposed to anyone else.
If people want a supply then they should pay the fixed costs as a SC. So maybe we charge for a meter, in full upfront for example. Pay for the supply to be added, in full, up front.
If your meter breaks, that sux, how do you want to pay for your new one?
Simply the costs are socialised right now, most people will not pay really in effect for what they have consumed (of install costs etc). Especially low usage customers.
Its where this always breaks down when people start looking at "their" costs and fail utterly to understand its not just the bit they can see.
We can adopt what Spain or France do.
They have more progressive modern charges, use more pay more, Spain does it via SC, if you use less your SC is cheaper, France do it via unit price.
The issue with the SC is it leans more on households with less adults (singletons and single parents), and is a bigger proportion of light user's bills. Naturally bigger households will think its a great idea.
Maintenance costs are not fixed, if we have to push more energy through the system then it needs more and higher capacity infrastructure to work. However the UK seems against progressive systems. Hence we so backwards on taxation and energy charges.
But since we so against complexity here, at the very least SC could be discounted for flats vs houses. As a house converted to flats will be providing far more SC per building than a house would.
Also on gas there is people who dont want a supply, but they cant turn it off, so the SC is akin to a protection racket, if you ask for meter to be disconnected, then the infrastructure guys after turn up to forcefully disconnect you from the street and charge you 4 figures for it when the request was only to disconnect the supply at the meter.
Yeah its discriminatory only offering that tariff to EV customers, that is a huge barrier to entry that benefits more wealthy people.
To your question thats already the cases on the suppliers I use.Like I said there are elements of fixed and variable and stepped costs.
Many are in reality stepped and we simply socialise the costs.
Eg when we build a new link from the east coast from offshore who should pick up the bill?
There are absolutely some "fixed" costs however, such as your meter, the wiring from your nearest substation to your house. Who should pay for that really other than you?
Much of the infrastructure was paid for previously its just the nature of these things.
When all the cables blew down when we had the last storms should we all pay a share, or just the people who live there?
Octopus will remove your gas meter for free btw.
Want to ditch gas for good? Here’s how we can help
As people move away from burning gas to heat our homes and our water, we thought we’d put together a blog explaining how we can help remove your gas meter and cap your supply safely.octopus.energy
When you or someone decided to have gas installed, or chose to buy a house with gas installed it was a conscious decision.
Do you think you should pay less for your phone/cable/fibre line because you use it less than the family next door?
Its nothing to do with shareholders, shareholders dont drive the price of anything. Its simple supply and demand. The price of gas has exploded because a huge supply has been cut out of the market so prices for what remains is going higher, nothing to do with shareholders.So you think wages have dragged up the cost of energy?
Energy been sold for the highest possible price on the market is shareholder driven, to maximise profits. What other reason would there be? Please at least explain your argument.
Also did you forget about the 200 billion of share buybacks since 2010 in energy companies?
Ok I will try to explain it kindergarten style.Its nothing to do with shareholders, shareholders dont drive the price of anything. Its simple supply and demand. The price of gas has exploded because a huge supply has been cut out of the market so prices for what remains is going higher, nothing to do with shareholders.
When the price of oil went negative during Covid was that also driven by shareholders? Or was it supply and demand again. Demand fell which led to a surplus on the market and prices collapsed, this time the opposite is happening.
Bit miffed you are only allowed to go on amazing fixed tariff (40p day 7.5p night fixed for 12 months) if you're fortunate enough to own an EV already. Variable likely to be 54p day and 38p night come October
Yeah its discriminatory only offering that tariff to EV customers, that is a huge barrier to entry that benefits more wealthy people.
Ok I will try to explain it kindergarten style.
If demand increases, then a supplier of a product is able to increase the price of their product and still sell it, you already get this part based on your reply.
However the bit you dont get is they do not have to increase the price of their product, it is a choice. However they typically will as CEO's have a duty to their shareholders to make as much money as possible.
Also in nearly every instance of increased profits, companies will send money to their shareholders, especially in the case of windfall profits.
Well in that case I consider the owner of the company equivalent to a shareholder, maybe I should say owners. But I dont know why people are trying to claim this is a wage driven event rather than owners wanting to maximise the return on their product, ultimately its a choice that can be made at what to sell your product at. I suppose similar to the point I made in the other thread that corp tax liability can be reduced simply by reducing profit, which some companies will do deliberately to reduce their tax liability.But it isn't shareholders. Its primarily because its a private company. Private companies sell their product at the best price regardless of having share holders
Perhaps go and research how the market functions in kindergarten style as well then.Ok I will try to explain it kindergarten style.
To your question thats already the cases on the suppliers I use.
My ISP andrews and arnold, give a discount if you a light user, and EE my mobile provider charges less for less data used per month.
Very light users on mobile can avoid fixed costs altogether albeit with an increase in costs for usage via PAYG or goody bag billing systems. My second phone which I use for inbound only, I havent paid a penny for about a year.
Paying a daily fee just to be "connected" to something doesnt sit right with me and it never will, its in affect a tax. A middle ground I could just about accept would be if no usage is registered for the day then SC is waived for the day but its charged if usage is registered. The exception to this is unmetered products.
That octopus page is just the meter disconnection, later on the gas infrastructure people will turn up and do a expensive street disconnection, that is the issue, for some reason they dont like having people connected to the gas system with a disconnected meter, there is a thread about it on MSE.
By the way some time ago I did a calculation of the amount of annual SC paid by the entire country, its in the billions (but cant remember the exact amount), if that isnt enough to make repairs then something is very wrong.