Engine Sizes

I'm a Turbo man myself, more specifically Audi Inline 5 Turbo. I'm quite happy that Audi have gone back to their Inline 5 Turbo "roots" with the new TT RS and the "New" quattro.
 
But the 2 litre focus engine is apparently 209g per kg co2 and the sr20 det 230 so only 10 percent more but about 50percent more power so that makes no sense to just obsolete a more powerful engine that releases more co2.

Also there are Ferrari that emit more co2 but they still make engines. Heck the Mazda mps produces 230 g p kg too but that engine is still made or was in 2006 so this in no way explains why engines like sr20det got canned when they did.

Mine is 249g/km
 
What annoys me is back in the old days it was RS turbo this, and Cosworth turbo that... However now its Ecoboost. Why cant they just call it 1.6 Turbo? oh yes, because it wont impress the hippies.
 
I would guess that the average size today is definitely less than 2.0L.

Tomorrow on your way to work, count the number of hatchbacks and probably 1.9TDis. Even those newish A5s that the reps drive are mostly 2.0T or TD.

That's not going to be many cars... My work is about 300yds away... :p

But I get what you mean.:)
 
I have just come to the end of an environmental manufacturing study.

The way we live, the products we buy, use chemicals etc to make and then throw into a landfill mean we are completed ****ed in the near future. Raw materials, landfill space, water shortages, power shortages etc.

Reducing car emissions does nothing as this is couple of percent at most improvement in the world's emissions when we need something like 10x the reduction.

The focus should be on new cars and clean power plants. Tweaking an internal combustion engine is not going to make a lot of difference.

All imo of course, but I completely fail to see how dropped a few % of CO2 emissions will do anything when I drive past an enourmous coal power station and a massive landfill site. Carbon Dioxide is the least of our worries in the mid-long term!

I would like to see some bigger engined cars out there. As others have mentioned, calling the new Ford engines ecoboost sounds a bit pansy tbh.
 
Last edited:
This is quite simple really.

There are no limits on CO2, this is evident by the fact you can still buy a Veyron, all the hyperbole is really off the mark. Taxation on CO2 is just an attempt to influence consumer choices.

Emissions are nasty stuff that the EURO emission targets set limits for.

The wiki graph is a decent simplification of the targets for some pollutants, of course EU5 came in at the end of 2010 not 2008.

Euronorms_Diesel.png


Source for a read if you want to see in more detail:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_emission_standards
 
Isn't that what killed the 2zz and the high rev Honda engined so the reason for changing to low displacement high technical didn't pay off as they have been killed too.

In this country at least.

Not sure how it'll make a difference to the atmosphere though...
 
This is quite simple really.

There are no limits on CO2, this is evident by the fact you can still buy a Veyron, all the hyperbole is really off the mark. Taxation on CO2 is just an attempt to influence consumer choices.

Emissions are nasty stuff that the EURO emission targets set limits for.

The wiki graph is a decent simplification of the targets for some pollutants, of course EU5 came in at the end of 2010 not 2008.

Euronorms_Diesel.png


Source for a read if you want to see in more detail:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_emission_standards

Do these limitations only apply to mass produced cars?
 
I think (might be completely wrong!) that it is a fleet average. So as long as all of the cars within the manufacturers fleet stay under this average it'll be ok.
 
Fleet averages only apply to CO2. The target by 2012 is 120g/km, however this is likely to be increased through lobbying as only Fiat are near it I think.
 
Its only a ACEA proposal on CO2 limits, its only the French who are really pushing those limits as their marques are pretty much their already.
 
variable displacement on large engines (or hybrids like Lexus LS600 etc) give you an oportunity to have small engine efficiency at low loads and big engine power profile when you need it.

"Instant torque" was mentioned earlier in the thread. I presume this is a reference to electric in some form? If not, tell more.

Sure there are lots more small engines now than there were but there are also a lot more large engines. Even VW make V8s and V10s now which would have been unthinkable in say 1990?
 
Back
Top Bottom