I'm not sure whether or not I would be classified as a "true" engineer - it all depends on perspective really:
On the one hand I have an MSc and a PhD in Engineering subjects, I work in the Engineering department of a University, and I tend to publish my research mainly in engineering journals. On the other hand my first degree was in maths, and 95% of what I do is at least derived from mathematical manipulation and programming. I haven't worked with any machinery or performed any physical experiments in the past five years.
I do tend to think of myself as an engineer, and looking at the definitions I should qualify for chartered engineer status - but I don't think many other people would think of me as an engineer. To others in our department, who tend to do more practical work, I'm a mathematician. To my friends back home (who are mainly welders / fitters etc) people who do "poncy computer type work and sit behind a desk" have no right to call themselves an engineer. They actually get really wound up about this - to them, an engineer is someone who works with machinery, and anyone else who calls himself an engineer is just a fraud and a "poser".
Personally I don't really care either way. When I apply for a job it will be clear what skill-sets are required. I doubt many welders will turn up for a job involving writing CFD simulation code, and vice-versa. Neither do I believe that wide use of the term "engineer" dilutes the market-value of work done by "true" engineers. The only devaluation of the term is in the perception of the general public. But personally I couldn't give a crap what other people's perception of my job is. I certainly never use the term "engineer" when people ask me what I do...
On the one hand I have an MSc and a PhD in Engineering subjects, I work in the Engineering department of a University, and I tend to publish my research mainly in engineering journals. On the other hand my first degree was in maths, and 95% of what I do is at least derived from mathematical manipulation and programming. I haven't worked with any machinery or performed any physical experiments in the past five years.
I do tend to think of myself as an engineer, and looking at the definitions I should qualify for chartered engineer status - but I don't think many other people would think of me as an engineer. To others in our department, who tend to do more practical work, I'm a mathematician. To my friends back home (who are mainly welders / fitters etc) people who do "poncy computer type work and sit behind a desk" have no right to call themselves an engineer. They actually get really wound up about this - to them, an engineer is someone who works with machinery, and anyone else who calls himself an engineer is just a fraud and a "poser".
Personally I don't really care either way. When I apply for a job it will be clear what skill-sets are required. I doubt many welders will turn up for a job involving writing CFD simulation code, and vice-versa. Neither do I believe that wide use of the term "engineer" dilutes the market-value of work done by "true" engineers. The only devaluation of the term is in the perception of the general public. But personally I couldn't give a crap what other people's perception of my job is. I certainly never use the term "engineer" when people ask me what I do...
.
. 