Enoch

Status
Not open for further replies.
cleanbluesky said:
Also known as discussion and debate... but it seems comments on the thread starter are of higher priority to some here than any analysis of content either way.

So what did you mean by 'And it seems he wasn't misleading over details either?' Remove the ambiguity and offer a staunch opinion, maybe people would respond more postively in the first few posts. The OP seems like a thinnly veiled attempt to condemn Black people to me.
 
Gosh yes because EVERY single person with more melanin in their skin than say.. me for example is going to act in exactly the same way as every other person with more melanin in their skin!! (this is the reason some people have darker skin btw, not because they are evil or retarded but because somewhere along the line their heritage was from a hotter environment with more UV that needed to be filtered, so their skin compensated in the usual amazing way the human body does.)

Im sorry im sick and tired of people commenting on other peoples actions simply because of the damned colour of their skin. What we need to be worried about specifically is community behaviour. Whether that be 'chavs', a specific religous group or something else. Theres an acceptable level that society in this country has slowly come to realise, currently extremist religous types are waaaay beyond that as are gang members, people who destroy property etc etc.

There must be a reason the vast majority are of different enthnicities to say.. myself... however that just is not important, their colour or creed is a non issue, their way of thinking however is...

please please please can we stop brooding over what colour these people are and focus more on what type of trouble they cause in society?? The sooner we do that the sooner the "race" issue gets lost and the behaviour itself (no matter WHO is behaiving innapropriately) takes front stage...

i cant be the only one sick and tired of reading and hearing about how "i do what i do because of the racist nature of the country around me" well lets take away the race, lets take away the quantifiable, simple physical differences and lets bring the fact that certain types of behaviour are acceptable and certain types are not... that way white people dont get away with things simply because they are white and people of other skin colours dont get vilified even more (or perhaps softer treatment due to PC'ness.)

Scum is scum, lets treat all scum alike...

(sorry i think that may be termed "pent up aggression" :p)
 
Shackley said:
Not that I know of :confused: Presumably your obsession with RTMing everyone who doesn't agree absolutely with you hasn't had the effect you hoped for.

Quick, quick fire off amnother RTM :D

What obsession is that then? Care to expand or is this yet another personal attack with no basis? I'll RTM personal attacks on me, got a problem with it?
 
Royality said:
So what did you mean by 'And it seems he wasn't misleading over details either?' Remove the ambiguity and offer a staunch opinion, maybe people would respond more postively in the first few posts. The OP seems like a thinnly veiled attempt to condemn Black people to me.
That sounds paranoid to me...
 
Royality said:
So what did you mean by 'And it seems he wasn't misleading over details either?' Remove the ambiguity and offer a staunch opinion, maybe people would respond more postively in the first few posts. The OP seems like a thinnly veiled attempt to condemn Black people to me.

Given that the OP merely addresses the potential accuracy of historical events I suggest you examine your own feelings if you feel that it condemns black people
 
VIRII said:
Why is the immediate reaction of visage and his band of merry chaps to immediately mock and post garbage in any thread that might not confirm their world view?

Is the intention to provoke? Or to try and turn the thread into a state of ridicule so that no intelligent discussion can be had?

I believe it is called thread trashing and has become prevailent recently specifically from posters such as visage.


If you don't want to have a sensible discussion then please don't try to stop others from having one.

VIRII said:
ROFL at the post from ???? but there are 5 letters in Spawn :)

And whats the intention of your post then?
 
vonhelmet said:
Now that's hypocrisy. Bitch about personal attacks in GD, and then get right down to it yourself.
An inevitable consequence of "if you can't beat them join them".
If standards are not enforced and people get personal then eventually the targets will respond in kind.
Or would you suggest that you and those with opinions like yours can be personal but those who disagree with you can not?
 
VIRII said:
An inevitable consequence of "if you can't beat them join them".
If standards are not enforced and people get personal then eventually the targets will respond in kind.

Well, I agree with that. I sometimes wonder why the mods don't intervene sooner.

VIRII said:
Or would you suggest that you and those with opinions like yours can be personal but those who disagree with you can not?

When did I personally attack anyone? :confused:
 
5ingh said:
And whats the intention of your post then?
To see if the person referred to in the post is indeed spawn as it clearly imitates his behaviour and posting style.

Why what is the intention of your post?
 
5ingh said:
And whats the intention of your post then?


To be an utter **** as per usual, he does it with Visage as well..cant handle being ignored i think.

CBS i think your cool too....xenophobically cool really..

Sorry i heard my ears burning and had to come and check out what the fuss was all about :).
 
VIRII said:
THe phrase "people with opinions LIKE yours" doesn't necessarily mean you specifically does it?

Fair enough, it's just a curious way of phrasing the generalisation to cite me without including me.

Although in fact, given that you put "you and" at the start of it, your defence actually makes no sense.
 
vonhelmet said:
Well, I agree with that. I sometimes wonder why the mods don't intervene sooner.
I guess that they can not be everywhere at once, nipping this type of thread trashing in the bud would be nice though.
 
Shackley said:
Enoch Powell was of course a bit off the mark with his 'rivers of blood' prediction.
That maybe the case, but one part of his speech leapt out to me;
Enoch Powell said:
She ["The Woman that never was"] went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said, "Racial prejudice won't get you anywhere in this country." So she went home.
"PC" is nothing new then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom