aren't thinking about what you are saying
The only people not thinking are the ones who claim Formula 1 is made exciting by possibility of death.
aren't thinking about what you are saying
The only people not thinking are the ones who claim Formula 1 is made exciting by possibility of death.
Then please tell me how you have racing with no risk of death?
You guys are. Over reacting and aren't thinking about what you are saying.
Racing will always have risk and as such the chance of death. Remove all those risks and you do not have racing.
However, the statement that racing wouldn't be racing without the chance of death is just garbage designed to ignite argument. You are confusing F1 with Gladiator battles. The idea of F1 is to win, not to kill everybody. Death has absolutely no purpose in racing.
It's not the death. .
I haven't said that, what I have said is if you remove the risks then you are removing the exciting parts (speed, wheel to wheel racing? Etc) you can not have those things without risk.
Nah he's said he's not doing all of them this season, apparently it's a bit of a trek to the commentary box here.No Brundle pit walk
I haven't said that
Again please tell me how you can have racing with no chance of death?
Go on explain it, you contradict yourself, you agree with me with your first line, then take it all back on your last line.
Ditto. EJ grid walk *cringes*Ladies! Theres a race on, come on
EJ and Jake doing the grid walk is pants.
The risk of a crash, yeah, there always needs to be that.
The risk of death? No thanks.
You cant. But I dont want or need it to make the sport exciting. The chance of death is an unfortunate yet unavoidable (yet limitable) consequence of going racing, it is not a requirement to make the sport exciting.