EBD hasn't yet been reduced to 10% yet and is due to happen at Silverstone...correct?
Indeed, it does make me wonder, if all other aspects of F1 were the absolute pinnacle of thrills and excitement but it was 100% guaranteed that no driver could die - he seems to be saying he'd find it boring, simply because no one might die?
?
How have you come to the conclusion that the pinnacle of motorsport is the chance of death if you make a mistake?
Well no, what he said was, that unless people might die, it's not exciting.
I just don't see it, there is plenty of excitement to be had without risking death at every race.
Stop trying to backtrack on your own argument. The risk of something is only there if the chance of it is.
I
The only people not thinking are the ones who claim Formula 1 is made exciting by possibility of death.
However, the statement that racing wouldn't be racing without the chance of death is just garbage designed to ignite argument. You are confusing F1 with Gladiator battles. The idea of F1 is to win, not to kill everybody. Death has absolutely no purpose in racing.
It's not the death. .
The risk of a crash, yeah, there always needs to be that.
The risk of death? No thanks.
You cant. But I dont want or need it to make the sport exciting. The chance of death is an unfortunate yet unavoidable (yet limitable) consequence of going racing, it is not a requirement to make the sport exciting.
My prediction for the race:
Vettel wins, nobody dies, AcidHell2 and Surnama claim the race is boring.
So you agree with us then in that sunama's comment that the possibility of death is what makes Formula 1 exciting is retarded?
IMO there must always be a possibility of a death in F1...that's what makes it exciting.
The possibility of death is what makes Formula 1 exciting. It's a pretty clear statement really. Without possibility of death, it isn't exciting.
.