These people 'trying to get to net zero'. Are they the ones taking advantage of the massively beneficial BIK rate or the ones picking up heavily depreciated used EVs?Or set a minimum in the middle somewhere eg £75, for them to harp on about net zero and wanting us to have cleaner transport, then penalizing the people who are trying to go net zero.
If they set a minimum like that they would raise more money than just dumping £180 on EV owners, but the budget favours people who are keeping their ICE cars with fuel duty being frozen but nothing to help EV owners on the charging side of things.
I only know of one single person who went EV, new, out of their own pocket. I know dozens who are in it for the BIK.
The localised reduction in exhaust emissions are a great side effect to the financial benefits, not the other way around.
The best net result will be people driving an EV and simply deciding "you know what, I prefer this" not hammering home being the saviours of our planet because a push bike is a far better tool for that job!
Last edited: