Deleted User 298457
Deleted User 298457
I also got paid to avoid using electricity at the predicted peak time period.
Works great while it’s a select few.Keep up at the back.
Ah yes, the pillar of all sense and sensibilities - the mighty noble second hand car dealer.Works great while it’s a select few.
Wait until EVs are more widespread.
This is only a tiny fraction of the issue anyway - wait until your battery is borked on your 10 year old vehicle.
Many second hand car dealers refuse to deal with EVs for this reason.
Works great while it’s a select few.
Wait until EVs are more widespread.
This is only a tiny fraction of the issue anyway - wait until your battery is borked on your 10 year old vehicle.
Many second hand car dealers refuse to deal with EVs for this reason.
So we are creating a two tier elitest system? Well no surprises there then.Errm more people do a saving period is better.
Sorry, my cars don't get to 10 years old anyway. Although my 22year old Insight is still around.
Those second hand dealers will be going out of business that's, don't confused consequence and effect.
Works great while it’s a select few.
Wait until EVs are more widespread.
This is only a tiny fraction of the issue anyway - wait until your battery is borked on your 10 year old vehicle.
Many second hand car dealers refuse to deal with EVs for this reason.
They have to buy a new one, so whats the difference in buying a battery?
Seems like the best contender for large heavy goods vehicles etc. Not sure it'll catch on for personal cars. Shell are closing one of the few stations they have.Is hydrogen fuel cars better?
Producing green hydrogen at a competitive cost vs petrol/diesel is the major issue.Is hydrogen fuel cars better?
Biden is subsidising it's supply, shell/NE and denmark are building electrolysers to take surplus local wind power, -and-,Producing green hydrogen at a competitive cost vs petrol/diesel is the major issue.
Yes - but the inefficiencies in producing that hydrogen in the first place make it a stupid idea to spend too much money on R&D of fuel cells. Why build future hopes on something that only gets a fraction of what you put in, back out?Plus the best use for hydrogen is to "drive" a fuel cell and not for direct combustion
Producing green hydrogen at a competitive cost vs petrol/diesel is the major issue.
It would need to use electricity produced from wind/solar and the final energy output is around 33% of the energy used to create the hydrogen in the firsts place, in a combustion engine scenario that is.
As every nay sayer will tel you, wind and solar are useless for reliable electricity production - yet they will still claim hydrogen is the way forward.![]()
Reliability.. if it wasn't for wind/ solar energy then the gas consumption through the last year would have meant we would most likely have had blackouts.Wind and solar are poor for reliable electricity production, but that's also what makes it perfect for green hydrogen...
To have a grid where we use mostly renewable energy means we need to produce meaningful amounts of energy during those periods where renewables only get 10% or less of their rated capacity, e.g. we need to have a massive surplus of renewables. So when those renewables are actually generating at 75%+ of their rated capacity we'll end up with a huge oversupply of energy, which could get funnelled into Hydrogen production.
Reliability.. if it wasn't for wind/ solar energy then the gas consumption through the last year would have meant we would most likely have had blackouts.
Windpower alone produced 26.8% of the electricity we used in 2022.
Watch this and listen to the part where countries with renewable energy are more reliable than countries without it.
![]()
Robert Goes Solo Down Under! | The Fully Charged Podcast 197
This week’s podcast is verging on a classic Robert rant!Sharing his thoughts on Dunkelflaute, energy intermittency and sovereign wealth funds, Robert also co...youtu.be
Which would be perfect then. Solar energy is best used when storing energyWind and solar are poor for reliable electricity production, but that's also what makes it perfect for green hydrogen...
To have a grid where we use mostly renewable energy means we need to produce meaningful amounts of energy during those periods where renewables only get 10% or less of their rated capacity, e.g. we need to have a massive surplus of renewables. So when those renewables are actually generating at 75%+ of their rated capacity we'll end up with a huge oversupply of energy, which could get funnelled into Hydrogen production.
Would having almost every household have solar panels and batteries help the whole country?Remind me why the national grid and energy suppliers have been paying people to not use electricity again? Is it perhaps because the wind was too low to generate enough electricity?
I'm not against renewables, I'm saying we need more... A lot more. Currently we have ~20GW of wind capacity (and actually currently generating a nice ~16GW), we need closer to 200GW of wind capacity. But that also means at times like this we'd have ~120GW excess generation.
Obviously yes, but it's pretty expensive on a per MWh basis compared to large solar farms and grid scale storageWould having almost every household have solar panels and batteries help the whole country?