Even Augustus Gloop ain't safe (Dahl being censored)

it is the right-wing nutters like the US republicans that ban books
Except that is not true anymore, those we once called liberals are happy to get in on the act now. They are also smarter they get the books banned before they're published. Sensitivity writers are hounding writers out of publishing houses and removing the opportunity for books to be published in the first place. The suspicion of being unclean is often sufficient for marginal writers these days to be cast into the abyss.
 
Except that is not true anymore, those we once called liberals are happy to get in on the act now. They are also smarter they get the books banned before they're published. Sensitivity writers are hounding writers out of publishing houses and removing the opportunity for books to be published in the first place. The suspicion of being unclean is often sufficient for marginal writers these days to be cast into the abyss.
Citation please. The only states I see banning books are red states afraid of teaching their kids about the real world. Something the alt right only maintain as a value when it is about racism but not homosexuality for instance.
 
The country saw a growing effort to ban books in schools and libraries nationwide in 2022, and researchers expect to see more efforts to challenge books in 2023 as some Republican-backed laws across the country aim to restrict LGBTQ and racial content in school books.

While activists across the political spectrum have sought to restrict or protest some forms of literature, the vast majority of book challenges are from conservative-leaning groups, researchers say. Only a handful of efforts have also come from liberal sources, mainly targeting books with racist or offensive language.

Books targeted by conservative groups were overwhelmingly written by or about people of color and LGBTQ people, according to anti-censorship researchers. According to PEN American and the ALA, many of the challenges reference the sexual content or inherent messaging in the books.

Banned Books Lists from the ALA show that these groups have challenged young adult books such as "The Hate U Give" and "The Bluest Eye," which discuss racism in the United States, as well as book titles like "Gender Queer" and "All Boys Aren't Blue" which discuss LGBTQ identities, sexuality and gender.

Meanwhile, liberal efforts criticized or restricted books in the name of anti-racism or progressive ideals. Books like “Of Mice and Men;” “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” and several Dr. Seuss titles have been challenged in some schools and libraries due to racist language or imagery throughout the years, including the use of the n-word or insensitive imagery of racial stereotypes, according to the ALA.
 
Last edited:
I quite like Spiked here's another story on the matter of sensitivity readers.
This is an example of sensitivity writers getting writers kicked out by their publishers although in this case it was a proposed re-write of an already released award winning book.
Citation please. The only states I see banning books are red states afraid of teaching their kids about the real world. Something the alt right only maintain as a value when it is about racism but not homosexuality for instance.
I didn't say states, I implied that books don't need banning because an equivalent act is taking place before publishing. If you can hold your sensitive nose long enough to check out a few right(er) wing opinion sites. Unherd and Spiked are two I often peruse. Stories of cancellation by publishing houses are not uncommon, often to appease activists inside and outside the publshing houses.

I'm surprised that anyone would question the notion that activists work hard to remove from the public sphere thosewho dare to hold views they don't agree with. The modern social activist is as everybit as bad as the stereotypical right winger of yesteryear (PTA meeting "Field of Dreams").
 
This is an example of sensitivity writers getting writers kicked out by their publishers although in this case it was a proposed re-write of an already released award winning book.

I didn't say states, I implied that books don't need banning because an equivalent act is taking place before publishing. If you can hold your sensitive nose long enough to check out a few right(er) wing opinion sites. Unherd and Spiked are two I often peruse. Stories of cancellation by publishing houses are not uncommon, often to appease activists inside and outside the publshing houses.

I'm surprised that anyone would question the notion that activists work hard to remove from the public sphere thosewho dare to hold views they don't agree with. The modern social activist is as everybit as bad as the stereotypical right winger of yesteryear (PTA meeting "Field of Dreams").
Are these activists in the room right now?
 
This is an example of sensitivity writers getting writers kicked out by their publishers although in this case it was a proposed re-write of an already released award winning book.

I didn't say states, I implied that books don't need banning because an equivalent act is taking place before publishing. If you can hold your sensitive nose long enough to check out a few right(er) wing opinion sites. Unherd and Spiked are two I often peruse. Stories of cancellation by publishing houses are not uncommon, often to appease activists inside and outside the publshing houses.

Got any examples ? Im not saying they don't exist but i've just quickly googled the subject and can't really find anything about petitions to publishing houses by leftist activists... then again im not entirely sure what to search for.

There's also a fairly big difference between politicans trying to pass laws to ban books and some screechers on twitter moaning about outdated language in books.
 
Got any examples ? Im not saying they don't exist but i've just quickly googled the subject and can't really find anything about petitions to publishing houses by leftist activists... then again im not entirely sure what to search for.

There's also a fairly big difference between politicans trying to pass laws to ban books and some screechers on twitter moaning about outdated language in books.
This rag recently had trouble with internal activists employees not liking what is published.
 
Last edited:
Thank god. I can enjoy a Turnip and read a RD.

Also, the "woke" books still exist. It is just that Sky News needs to cater to the gammon audience and they are well aware they won't make it passed the headline, so it is in the sub headline:

"Publisher Puffin has announced two editions of Dahl's books will be published after dividing public opinion after announcing the collection would be edited to remove or rewrite language deemed offensive."
 

I saw that just now.

Common sense 1 - 0 woke agenda

We need to apply this logic to Doctor Who and Disney / Marvel next (and I saw that as a big fan of Disney myself).
 
although capitalism still wins as now they get to sell two versions instead of one !
Who is going to be buy both versions of the book?

It most likely hurts their bottom line. Their volumes are now split between two products, which makes both books cost slightly more to produce. What will be interesting to see is which version is still on sale in a year or two.
 
Who is going to be buy both versions of the book?

It most likely hurts their bottom line. Their volumes are now split between two products, which makes both books cost slightly more to produce. What will be interesting to see is which version is still on sale in a year or two.
Well if I had kids, I’d be 100% buying the originals.

Sanity prevails at last.
 
I'm glad Puffin books resisted and left the books in tact.

Morally people have no right to change other peoples works. If they don't like it then just ban it. But we know they won't ban it because they know the reaction.

This whole mind set is the same as those that think talking to someone they consider racist, xenophobe (any other ism or phobe) etc person means that you automatically will be seduced by their opinions. It's a very weak mentality that is being taught. It's teaching kids to be victims, and infantilizing the rest of us adults.
 
Back
Top Bottom