Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
Not sure what you're getting at, Greg. It wasnt unwinder who said they couldnt have implemented his technology without the sourcecode.
Unwinder wrote rivatuner. EVGA approached Unwinder to supply them with a skinned version with some additional opther features. MSI approached them later for the same, but funded the development of more features (x64) that evga then wanted royalty free. EVGA then bitched and moaned when they didnt get. EVGA then 'rewrote' the backend code and claimed it was 100% in-house yet its basically identical to rivatuner, right down to the IDs assigned to tabs and buttons in the interface etc.. It's all in that thread.
Why are people assuming Unwinder owns the code at all? He didn't create Rivatuner, EVGA paid him way before Afterburner even was created and the only thing Unwinder did original was the 64 bit OSD support for all I can find. EVGA did that on their own, and made the mistake of making it look identical to that on Afterburner by possibly reverse engineering Rivatuner since PX 15 doesn't need it, but I don't really see anything stolen or copied at all.
Unwinder wrote rivatuner. EVGA approached Unwinder to supply them with a skinned version with some additional opther features. MSI approached them later for the same, but funded the development of more features (x64) that evga then wanted royalty free. EVGA then bitched and moaned when they didnt get. EVGA then 'rewrote' the backend code and claimed it was 100% in-house yet its basically identical to rivatuner, right down to the IDs assigned to tabs and buttons in the interface etc.. It's all in that thread.