Because they're at height which requires specialist officers to remove them - and that takes time to arrange.
Or... use a large pole or tazer gun to knock them off, then call some specialist paramedics
Because they're at height which requires specialist officers to remove them - and that takes time to arrange.
What annoys me is the sheer hypocrisy of your average XR demonstrator. They're happy to partake in society as it stands and all the luxuries it affords,
- smartphones to organise their disruption, the biggest irony of them all, it's well documented the amount of rare metals and elements that go into manufacturing these devices which no doubt ravage the planet through mining and contribute to pollution.
- infrastructure of roads and public transport so they can get around, and high rise buildings for somewhere to live in London. All of this takes a toll on the planet, in the materials and construction methods used, but they benefit from it all the same.
- the convenience of stopping at a shop like 'Pret A Manger' for a bite to eat where hordes of them were pictured queuing up. Do XR protestors think that the food sold in these places just magically appears, rather go through a complex chain of distribution involving many vehicles all contributing to pollution.
To me they just want to be seen as supporting a self-righteous crusade which makes them morally superior to the rest of us, without actually having any of the gumption to back it up other than dressing like hippies and spouting a load of rhetoric.
Not really hypocritical, they aren't asking for people to become cavemen
They're asking that money be spent on better technologies and alternatives to what we use now
Instead of coal solar, instead of petrol or desil electricity, carbon capture and offsetting etc
Just imagine how much of a better world we'd have if instead of trillions on a war with tribals in the desert we'd have put that money into energy tech?
Case in point being HS2, the same money would have paid for five nuclear power stations the size of Hinkley point C providing enough electricity to completely replace fossil fuel consumption.
Case in point being HS2, the same money would have paid for five nuclear power stations the size of Hinkley point C providing enough electricity to completely replace fossil fuel consumption.
It took forever to get the go ahead for Hinkley Point let alone 5. You would get the same people campaigning against that as well
Actually they are for nuclear power, their leader came out in support of it!
Stark contrast to the Green Party ideologues, or the Lib Dems who think there's not an "economic case" for saving the planet.
Aye it is, but it can't produce electricity, the technology to convert fusion power to electricity doesn't exist yet.
Some highlights of XR activity the last few days and causing criminal damage today.
At least the Police seem less tolerating with what they are doing.
There are few things more pathetic to watch than some middle class people utterly failing to break some glass using a hammer & chisel!
No one ever managed to get more energy out of a fusion reaction than they put in yet?First demonstration fusion plant is starting construction in the uk this year iirx
No one ever managed to get more energy out of a fusion reaction than they put in yet?
Did the AI designed one ever get built?
Alternatively it could be that people absolutely disagree with your concept that "if crime causes the police too much hassle then the police shouldn't deal with it"
Oh and the Golden Rule wouldn't count here as a conviction of those XR folks wouldn't be classed as against general public policy (i.e. public support) as only a minority support them or a silly upholding of a law
No one ever managed to get more energy out of a fusion reaction than they put in yet?
Did the AI designed one ever get built?