drunkenmaster
This message is hidden because drunkenmaster is on your ignore list.
Yet, he assumes the post is towards him without reading it.
I find it funny that almost every point Gimp made was argueing against a point I never made.
IE Vidic sucked, Hodgson should get manager of the season, Kompany should get player of the season. Then asking dumb questions like how many reds would Kompany have got suggesting it was as many or more than Vidic when firstly we all know that isn't true and secondly I'd specifically stated that he got away with MORE than ANYONE ELSE. If I'd said he got away with a lot, okay, but I'd already clearly stated that I thought he got away with a lot more than Kompany.
If a bunch of people on this forum could actually learn to read properly it would be helpful all around.
Oh, and the lazy "he's using stats" argument is rubbish. Never once have I ever claimed stats tell the whole story, they do tell PART of the story, and I also tell the other part aswell, not difficult. The vast majority of the time I use stats to counter someones ridiculous argument of say player X is the bestest every player and our best player this season, Nasri, 10 goals, no assists, 1 goal in 4 months, rubbish.