there is a 1.1 non turbo but it’s a waste of time.
Unfortunately that's the exact one she was looking at to avoid this issue, and that we realised (partly via this thread) has the exact same problem.there is a 1.1 non turbo but it’s a waste of time.
At that price it just makes sense to drive it till it blows.With all this in mind I asked for a quote from Parks Ford in Elgin for my B-Max on Friday and just got it. Holy ******* ****!!!!! £3050.72 over half of which is labour. The car won't even be worth that much by then (2027). This is really shameful of Ford as it's their **** up that caused this problem and they should be paying at least half the cost rather than screwing over the owners. Needless to say I am now looking for a new (to us) car. I also fired a email off to our housing association enquiring if they allow EV charging points to be fitted and they also just got back to me saying that they do but I would have to apply for permission which is just for the purpose of a paper trail and that permission will be granted. That opens up the possibility of a EV which would be perfect for us as long as the range is decent. Now to have a look around at what I can get for £11-12k.
Just out of interest I asked if there will be a recall on the Ecoboost engines in the UK as they have done in the US and was told it's highly unlikely as the american engines are different to the UK/Europe.
You intend to swap a car with a known complication for a car with a hybrid system?Whether the selling prices are different I don't know, but certainly if you look at the advertised prices, those cars approaching the big service and not yet having had it done do not seem to be priced down accordingly. So I think you're probably right that it's the right financial decision to sell it now while you can still accurately claim it has a full service history.
Whether that's a bit nasty to the person you're selling it to is open to opinion. But you'd presume if you sell to a dealer they already know about it.
This is exactly the M-I-L's intention. Selling it to a dealer network who is well aware of the situation. They have suggested a part-x value to her already which she is satisfied with.
Our difficulty is finding a replacement without the same issue - as per this thread. I will be going to our local Ford main dealer this week and seeing if they're willing to give me some guidance on the book prices for 'big' services for a ~2017 Fiesta, so we can gauge whether the hybrid version (which is apparently a chain rather than belt - but which has ancillaries on internal belts still) has a more palatable 10 year service cost, or whether it's exactly the same.
She really is keen on a Fiesta if we can find a way it makes sense. She may even choose to go with one anyway and suck up the 10 year service as an expected expense.
Isn't there an assessment of belt available boroscope/oil-analysis ? equally if you've regularly had good oil service , no idiot remap, should be less susceptible.With all this in mind I asked for a quote from Parks Ford in Elgin for my B-Max on Friday and just got it.
Belt in oil benefits perceived from 2013
https://www.pressebox.com/pressrele...n-Oil-Reduces-Friction-and-Noise/boxid/624199
According to FEV GmbH, an independent engine designer, the belt drive lowers fuel consumption compared to the chain, and therefore reduces CO2 emissions. In a 1.6 liter gasoline engine, for example, the belt drive reduces fuel consumption by more than 1% and saves up to 1.5 grams of CO2 per kilometer. "Belt drives are lighter and run a lot more quietly too. Belts don't tend to lengthen either," says Hermann Schulte, head of Timing Belt Development at the ContiTech Power Transmission Group. "A significant advantage, because a lengthening chain alters the engine timing. As a result, consumption increases and performance drops. Emissions levels are quickly exceeded." In endurance tests, a belt lengthened by just 0.1% after 240,000 kilometers of service life - the figure was five times greater with a chain.
..
The advantage of the timing belt in oil is that it has a narrower construction than the dry-running version and it is even quieter. In the case of a crankshaft pulley with 19 teeth, no noise can be detected, even with the engine operating under full load, because the oil not only reduces friction, it absorbs sound as well. This is important for the simple reason that the increasingly popular downsized engines generally run less smoothly.
when i was getting really ****** off about my egr on my 1.6 tdi Roomster was looking at the Skoda petrol models, the 1,0 tsi seems to have a dry Kevlar belt that is now classed as for life 150k after a technical bulletin (personally would stick to 5 or so years)Anyone know if Fabia or Polo engines have the same trap waiting for you? They seem to be the other top rated cars of that ilk.