Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 9,952
How much overclocking you planning on doing? Either will do 4.8GHz when pushed.
Anything over (or even up to) is silly given the amount of juice you will need to put through the CPU. Unless you just wanna bench and bragging right, which is fine. Then more VRM = better, but extreme overclocking would require watercooling, ect... And these dudes use Maximus boards, golden sample CPUs and stuff like that. It's all getting a bit expensive.
If you just want a fast stable board to say, 4.6GHz without going silly with voltages, either will do the job perfectly. I would tab on 4.4GHz myself and not bother with anything higher whatever the board (under 1.35V anyway). Voltages are everything, and the quality of the batch dictates how much voltage you need to reach a given speed. A good chip at 1.35V may give you 4.6GHz, medium chip 4.4GHz, a bad chip 4.2GHz, a uber chip 4.8GHz. With these boards they will be stable as rock at those voltages as it wont be pushing then near their limit. Anything above 1.38V is not recommended by Intel and frankly I don't think the risk warrant the fractional performance increase.
Anything over (or even up to) is silly given the amount of juice you will need to put through the CPU. Unless you just wanna bench and bragging right, which is fine. Then more VRM = better, but extreme overclocking would require watercooling, ect... And these dudes use Maximus boards, golden sample CPUs and stuff like that. It's all getting a bit expensive.
If you just want a fast stable board to say, 4.6GHz without going silly with voltages, either will do the job perfectly. I would tab on 4.4GHz myself and not bother with anything higher whatever the board (under 1.35V anyway). Voltages are everything, and the quality of the batch dictates how much voltage you need to reach a given speed. A good chip at 1.35V may give you 4.6GHz, medium chip 4.4GHz, a bad chip 4.2GHz, a uber chip 4.8GHz. With these boards they will be stable as rock at those voltages as it wont be pushing then near their limit. Anything above 1.38V is not recommended by Intel and frankly I don't think the risk warrant the fractional performance increase.
Last edited: