Finally a judge with some sense?

Suspended
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
33,209
Location
Northern England
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-39233617

Seem to be sensible words to me yet in the past when similar things have been voiced it's been declared to be victim blaming.

Surely locking your front door (so to speak) when you go out is just common sense? Bad people exist. We know they do. We cannot change it. So surely to take precautions against this bad people is ones own responsibility?
 
I'm not sure why you're talking about locking doors when the article hasn't mentioned burglary?

Anyway, suggesting women shouldn't get drunk because they'll probably get raped isn't just victim blaming, it's a tragic reflection of our society. The day we accept that being raped is a result of how much alcohol a woman has consumed is a sad day indeed.
Are you a bit special? Have you heard the word analogy before?
 
I'll take their opinion over yours or Chris's anytime pal. Also If you don't agree, provide your evidence as to why.
No. The onus is on them to provide evidence to back up their claim. Or you since you're the one making the claim. So provide it.

I'll give you a clue btw...rainn.org provide numbers and it doesn't back up your point of view.
 
No. I've posted a source which you've failed to debunk, so it stands. Why would a prominent website like that make stuff up? Seriously, take the tin foil hat off.

Then where are their statistics? Where are their references? Where are their sources?
 
The Rape Crisis National Service Standards (RCNSS) are a joint piece of work between Rape Crisis England & Wales and Rape Crisis Scotland.
Our aim is to ensure that no matter where a woman or girl survivor lives, she will receive a consistent and high quality response from any Rape Crisis member Centre she approaches for support.
The RCNSS were developed in full consultation with member Rape Crisis Centres, which means they are informed by the collective experience of frontline practitioners and the voices of survivors.
All 44 of our member Rape Crisis Centres went through the 3-yearly validation process in 2016 and all adhere to our National Service Standards.

http://rapecrisis.org.uk/nationalservicestandards_1.php

It's not some fake site it's an official organisation. If you'd stop badgering me and actually explore the site you would know this. :rolleyes:
Are you unable to read? I've now provided two sources which debunk their UNCORABORATED CLAIM.
 
Why should I believe your sources and how do they debunk the claims made by my source (that's right, my source NOY ME). I don't have a burden of proof pal as all I'm doing is quoting a source. Simple logic, too simple for you it would seem.
Get back on your meds you're posting absolute balls again.
 
Insults show you are on the defensive and therefore find my arguments valid. Just admit you got it wrong and move on.
I've provided, generously, two sources which shoot yours down. Yours makes a bold.claim with no back up.
You're somehow of the opinion that your source, again which provides no evidence, is better than two counter sources which show its not. One of those counter sources is the largest sexual abuse foundations.
You're either not of sound mind or so biased that despite overwhelming evidence you're taking one unsubstantiated sentence as gospel.
 
All I see is a newspaper article devoid of statistics.
Perhaps reading is not your forte

"One fact stood out. Of those convicted, 66 were black or mixed race, 13 were white and the remainder were from other countries including Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya."
 
Read the above posts. As usual you have the wrong end of the stick in this conversation.
Eh? We're talking about the race of perpetrators and you're posting tables showing the race of victims. You do understand the difference right?
 
This started when you disputed that my source implied most rapes were carried out by white people. I've being trying to show you this is true but seem hell bent on a pointless straw man.
Your source doesn't state that. Jesus, you don't even understand your own source!
I've never claimed it states that. You really are incapable of reading or clear thought here aren't you?

Go read your own posts and links then come back.
 
Back
Top Bottom