Finally a judge with some sense?

Pray tell is Chris, what proportion of rapists are immigrants in the UK?

Do you really need to bring immigration into every topic you touch?


No idea, the info is probably too politically incorrect to be found easily, but a lot of rapists
don't look very English to me, nor do they have names like Brown or Smith. Go figure.
This rapist certainly is an immigrant.

I bring it into topics where it's relevant, yes. Those that support uncontrolled immigration hate it.
 
Would you struggle to restrain yourself in the presence of a naked woman?

No, why should I? I have seen enough for the novelty to have long worn off, and many are monstrously unappealing. What a very odd question to
ask someone you don't know though...

I'm also curious what you think the police commissioner's marital status has to do with anything.

I usually find those women who take on the relatively new fangled Ms title are Liberal left wingers, often lacking in beauty, and
with their associated Liberal Leftie views on life, and again this rather ugly woman woman proves me correct. Anything else Vonhelmet?
 
No idea, the info is probably too politically incorrect to be found easily, but a lot of rapists
don't look very English to me, nor do they have names like Brown or Smith. Go figure.
This rapist certainly is an immigrant.

I bring it into topics where it's relevant, yes. Those that support uncontrolled immigration hate it.

Well one well publicized fact is that 90% of rapes are committed by people known to the victim. It's very rarely some man hiding in the bushes jumping out at women, whether they be British born or foreign.

And out of interest do you think the woman wearing different clothes in the case above would have caused a difference in result?

And funnily enough you complain about being called racist then make comments like "don't look very English to me, nor do they have names like Brown or Smith"...?
 
I'll take their opinion over yours or Chris's anytime pal. Also If you don't agree, provide your evidence as to why.
No. The onus is on them to provide evidence to back up their claim. Or you since you're the one making the claim. So provide it.

I'll give you a clue btw...rainn.org provide numbers and it doesn't back up your point of view.
 
No. The onus is on them to provide evidence to back up their claim. Or you since you're the one making the claim. So provide it.

No. I've posted a source which you've failed to debunk, so it stands. Why would a prominent website like that make stuff up? Seriously, take the tin foil hat off.
 
People routinely install security measures to prevent your house being robbed. High security doors and locks, not leaving windows open, keeping your car keys out of the way etc. Basically not making your house an easy target for thieves. Yet, for some unknown reason, not making yourself an easy target for a sexual predator and potential rapist is frowned upon and ridiculed?

Don't get me wrong, a woman should, if she wishes, get completely blind drunk without expecting anything to happen but *********, the world isn't like that.
 
No. I've posted a source which you've failed to debunk, so it stands. Why would a prominent website like that make stuff up? Seriously, take the tin foil hat off.

Then where are their statistics? Where are their references? Where are their sources?
 
Then where are their statistics? Where are their references? Where are their sources?

The Rape Crisis National Service Standards (RCNSS) are a joint piece of work between Rape Crisis England & Wales and Rape Crisis Scotland.
Our aim is to ensure that no matter where a woman or girl survivor lives, she will receive a consistent and high quality response from any Rape Crisis member Centre she approaches for support.
The RCNSS were developed in full consultation with member Rape Crisis Centres, which means they are informed by the collective experience of frontline practitioners and the voices of survivors.
All 44 of our member Rape Crisis Centres went through the 3-yearly validation process in 2016 and all adhere to our National Service Standards.

http://rapecrisis.org.uk/nationalservicestandards_1.php

It's not some fake site it's an official organisation. If you'd stop badgering me and actually explore the site you would know this. :rolleyes:
 
The Rape Crisis National Service Standards (RCNSS) are a joint piece of work between Rape Crisis England & Wales and Rape Crisis Scotland.
Our aim is to ensure that no matter where a woman or girl survivor lives, she will receive a consistent and high quality response from any Rape Crisis member Centre she approaches for support.
The RCNSS were developed in full consultation with member Rape Crisis Centres, which means they are informed by the collective experience of frontline practitioners and the voices of survivors.
All 44 of our member Rape Crisis Centres went through the 3-yearly validation process in 2016 and all adhere to our National Service Standards.

http://rapecrisis.org.uk/nationalservicestandards_1.php

It's not some fake site it's an official organisation. If you'd stop badgering me and actually explore the site you would know this. :rolleyes:
Are you unable to read? I've now provided two sources which debunk their UNCORABORATED CLAIM.
 
Are you unable to read? I've now provided two sources which debunk their UNCORABORATED CLAIM.

Why should I believe your sources and how do they debunk the claims made by my source (that's right, my source NOT ME). I don't have a burden of proof pal as all I'm doing is quoting a source. Simple logic, too simple for you it would seem.
 
Saying this is victim blaming is baffling. Unless we get to a situation like in minority report where police can stop rapists before they get the chance then it's always going to happen. It's not acceptable, and it's not the fault of the victim, but it is just a sad fact that it will occur. Why is it wrong to suggest someone tries to minimise their risk of becoming a victim?

If I walk across a zebra crossing without checking that the traffic is actually stopping and get run over then the fault lies with the driver, but I can help protect myself by waiting to ensure the traffic is actually stopping. Surely this is what this is about, trying to minimise your risk to personal safety. No blaming at all.
 
Why should I believe your sources and how do they debunk the claims made by my source (that's right, my source NOY ME). I don't have a burden of proof pal as all I'm doing is quoting a source. Simple logic, too simple for you it would seem.
Get back on your meds you're posting absolute balls again.
 
Insults show you are on the defensive and therefore find my arguments valid. Just admit you got it wrong and move on.
I've provided, generously, two sources which shoot yours down. Yours makes a bold.claim with no back up.
You're somehow of the opinion that your source, again which provides no evidence, is better than two counter sources which show its not. One of those counter sources is the largest sexual abuse foundations.
You're either not of sound mind or so biased that despite overwhelming evidence you're taking one unsubstantiated sentence as gospel.
 
I've provided, generously, two sources which shoot yours down. Yours makes a bold.claim with no back up.
You're somehow of the opinion that your source, again which provides no evidence, is better than two counter sources which show its not. One of those counter sources is the largest sexual abuse foundations.
You're either not of sound mind or so biased that despite overwhelming evidence you're taking one unsubstantiated sentence as gospel.

Where are the statistics in your sources?
 
Back
Top Bottom