• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Firestrike Standard Bench.

Lol, trying to now but my connection is being a pita, very very slow tonight.:(

Just started to dl 353.38, but sure enough theres another new hotfix driver just released, ver 353.45.
 
Last edited:
Scratch the above score, bit more with the newer drivers.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5331139

Score 16816 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti(1x) and Intel Core i7-4790K

Graphics Score
20471

Physics Score
13506

Combined Score
8532

I7 4790k @4.7ghz

Gtx 980ti @1489/3703, (+160/200) 353.38 driver
 
Last edited:
Bit weird this. I got the clocks higher on both the core and the mem. The scores went down??? Think I need to try a different Bios.

[email protected]
Titan X SC @ 1200/1917
Driver 353.30

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7662182

Score - 16964
Gfx - 20110 - Higher than stock settings
Physics - 15785 - Lower that stock settings?
Combined - 8230 - Lower than stock settings?

Bit confused about this if I'm honest :)
 
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7672248 - 17473

SCORE
17473 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti(1x) and Intel Core i7-5930K
Graphics Score 20611
Physics Score 16356
Combined Score 8570

Graphics card - 1530 Core +500 memory (reference 67c) - unlocked bios for power limit.

CPU @ 4.1ghz.
 
Hmm, a question.

Is there any reason why my x2 980ti would have a score of 32507, this seems very low - would it make much difference if one of the card wasn't in a x16 speed port?.

The clocks were stable at the 1450 & temps stable so no downclocking, curious as to how people have 38211+ on the graphics score!
 
elmarko said:
Hmm, a question.

Is there any reason why my x2 980ti would have a score of 32507, this seems very low - would it make much difference if one of the card wasn't in a x16 speed port?.

The clocks were stable at the 1450 & temps stable so no downclocking, curious as to how people have 38211+ on the graphics score!
Click to expand...

You have got to get the CPU clockspeed up to drive the GPUs.

Here is one I did earlier


Score 27986

NVIDIA GTX TITAN X(2x) @1462/1953

Intel Core i7-5960X @4.5

Graphics Score 39804

Physics Score 21633

Combined Score 10045

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5349199
 
SCORE 24148 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti(2x) and Intel Core i7-5930K

Graphics Score 33732

Physics Score 17847

Combined Score 9283

5930K @ 4.5ghz
GeForce GTX 980 Ti Reference cooler @ 1500 Mem @ +500.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7686629

Kaapstad said:
You have got to get the CPU clockspeed up to drive the GPUs.

Here is one I did earlier
Click to expand...
The 5960X make that much difference?, just done another with the clock speed upped to 4.5ghz, def a big improvement of my last score mind,
 
whyscotty said:
[email protected] - - 980ti@1310/2078 - - Dr 353.49

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5350614

Score - 17597
GFX - 21438
Physics - 13941
Comb - 9024
Click to expand...
Nice un, id like to get higher but cpu needs too much voltage to do so therefore gets very toasty. Card tops out at +160 without adding volts so may have to look into adding a touch. Temps or power limit dont seem to be an issue though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom