Fleecehold

Associate
Joined
21 Jan 2008
Posts
1,333
Location
Cotswolds
The lease was only 99 years when it was built. Was 92 when I bought it. Tbh I didn't know about the pitfalls of leasehold and it was the only way my ex and I could get on the ladder. And yes, I know all about the marriage value etc now, a bit too late mind.

The whole thing is a scam. What really baffles me is the housing association owns the other half so any sale makes them money. Surely if the lease running low creates a loss in value for them, why can't they just grant a lease extension? Obviously there's some ridiculous laws involved somewhere but it's a joke. I could sell it in the very near future I guess but again, I'd have to find somewhere I can afford in this area which isn't easy for a single dad.

I didn't realise shared ownership was a thing back then. But I suppose 1992 was after the mega recession!

Have you asked them for a quote to extend the lease? Or buy the FH? Don't ask, don't get and all that. Whilst it is a bit of a calculation, it is more of an art than a science. Yes you can value an income (the ground rent) quite accurately, but the rest of it is theoretical based on comparables etc. so certainly more of an art - the job of the surveyors involved. I did one years ago for my dad with Peveral being the FH (utter utter you know whats) and I got a reasonable result in the end paying £5k all in (they wanted £15k but messed up and didn't respond to my notice). As they are "in bed" with you, they might treat you differently?
 
Soldato
Joined
16 Aug 2009
Posts
7,751
The lease was only 99 years when it was built. Was 92 when I bought it. Tbh I didn't know about the pitfalls of leasehold and it was the only way my ex and I could get on the ladder. And yes, I know all about the marriage value etc now, a bit too late mind.

The whole thing is a scam. What really baffles me is the housing association owns the other half so any sale makes them money. Surely if the lease running low creates a loss in value for them, why can't they just grant a lease extension? Obviously there's some ridiculous laws involved somewhere but it's a joke. I could sell it in the very near future I guess but again, I'd have to find somewhere I can afford in this area which isn't easy for a single dad.
99 year lease here too 1982 - 2081 so 58 years left on the lease. Just had to pay ground rent too pay-up-or-else letter arrived on teh doormat this morning for half-year payrment.

Do you not have the option of changing management companies?
If you can contact enough people and then get a majority to agree its been attempted here but nothing came of it too many properties rented out to buy-to-let landlords proving impossible to contact
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
31 Dec 2023
Posts
43
Location
Kent
99 year lease here too 1982 - 2081 so 58 years left on the lease. Just had to pay ground rent too pay-up-or-else letter arrived on teh doormat this morning for half-year payrment.


If you can contact enough people and then get a majority to agree its been attempted here but nothing came of it too many properties rented out to buy-to-let landlords proving impossible to contact

You only need 51% or 60% to move it forward.
Best way start a resident association. You can do one per building.

Why don't you first get a list of all the people that own and live in the flats. See what % you are able to get. Then if you need a few more just go to land registry and get the address.

You do not need to contact all.

I completely understand your situation.

Shared ownership, leasehold are a con.

Shared ownership is just crazy, after 8 or 12 weeks the housing association can legally kick you out and their goes your share too.

People failed to understand the methods these housing associations will go. They are none profit but act like profit taking companies. They are all owned by equity companies getting a free ride at the expense of tax payers and local council.

People need to look under the hood of these housing associations, and will be shocked.
Best option to stay away from housing associations.
If you have no choice the council shared ownership is much better out of the two for many reasons.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
12 Apr 2007
Posts
11,865
No. From my last email exhcange, I can only tell them that i don't think I'm getting value for money and they'll apparently endeavour to review the relevant contract awards.

Send them a Subject acess request.. it's a legally binding request, It likely won't give you the full picture, but it will let them know you are serious, and they can only charge you a maximum of £10 for the information, so it is standard practice to send a postal order for £10 along with the request (via special delivery, so probably another fiver on top), so they cannot make up excuses to delay things.

It will provide you with a starting point and some potentially usefull information going forward, especially if they fail to comply with the request in a timley manner.. I belive delay of any more than 30 working days would be considered a breach, and actionable in court, although a formal complaint to the ICO would be the next natural step should they fail to fully comply within 30 working days.

If nothing else, it will make them sweat and give them a lot of admin to do, so it puts a bit of pressure onto them.


 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
11 Jan 2008
Posts
964
Location
Swindon
I didn't realise shared ownership was a thing back then. But I suppose 1992 was after the mega recession!

Have you asked them for a quote to extend the lease? Or buy the FH? Don't ask, don't get and all that. Whilst it is a bit of a calculation, it is more of an art than a science. Yes you can value an income (the ground rent) quite accurately, but the rest of it is theoretical based on comparables etc. so certainly more of an art - the job of the surveyors involved. I did one years ago for my dad with Peveral being the FH (utter utter you know whats) and I got a reasonable result in the end paying £5k all in (they wanted £15k but messed up and didn't respond to my notice). As they are "in bed" with you, they might treat you differently?

Sorry I meant it had 92 left years when I bought it. It was built in 2008-9 so actually it must have had a couple more years than I thought above.

But no, I haven't looked in to it in regards to cost because I'm really overwhelmed with life stuff as it is and even if it was only 5k, which I very much doubt, I don't know where I'd get that from.

Other issue I've just thought of is I fixed my mortgage for 5 years a year or so ago which means selling would add an erc to my fees I think. Thinking of it all is now making me feel even more overwhelmed.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
25 Mar 2004
Posts
15,796
Location
Fareham
Other issue I've just thought of is I fixed my mortgage for 5 years a year or so ago which means selling would add an erc to my fees I think. Thinking of it all is now making me feel even more overwhelmed.

You can usually port a mortgage from current house to the next one you buy. It's only ERC if you end it early and stop paying it full stop.
 
Associate
Joined
11 Jan 2008
Posts
964
Location
Swindon
You can usually port a mortgage from current house to the next one you buy. It's only ERC if you end it early and stop paying it full stop.

It's a shared ownership mortgage though, might be able to do something I guess if I stayed with the same lender. I should probably look into it all really, just don't have the headspace for it all at the moment.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Mar 2008
Posts
6,267
Location
Deep North
Why are a lot of these management companies down as dormant companies on Companies House?

I know someone who lives on a newish estate that has a management company 'Xxxx Ltd' but it shows as dormant and has been ever since the estate was built 18 years ago. The letters the residents get that come asking for the money always state 'Yyyy Ltd' on behalf of 'Xxxx Ltd' where 'Yyyy Ltd' is the parent company of 'Xxxx Ltd'.

'Yyyy Ltd' also appear to be the parent company of another 100+ dormant companies.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
OP
Joined
5 Dec 2003
Posts
4,949
I'm not sure about dormant companies but it seems to be a new management company is set up per estate managed, rather than all falling under the same overall company.
 
Associate
Joined
21 Jan 2008
Posts
1,333
Location
Cotswolds
99 year lease here too 1982 - 2081 so 58 years left on the lease. Just had to pay ground rent too pay-up-or-else letter arrived on teh doormat this morning for half-year payrment.


If you can contact enough people and then get a majority to agree its been attempted here but nothing came of it too many properties rented out to buy-to-let landlords proving impossible to contact

Oooft, that's going to be some cost to renew that lease...
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Posts
12,355
Saw this article pop up on my Google feed this morning:


Suggests ground rents will be capped at 250 a year.

Hopefully this passes and becomes law, our recalculation for our ground rent is due in 2027, which i suspect will pass £250. It should help out lots of homeowners who have the doubling ground rent clauses.
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Posts
12,355
^^^ Good news. Doesn’t help with service charges but better than nothing.

Yeah I can understand service charges being a bit more complicated because they're supposed to pay for maintenance of grounds, doors, lifts, etc and cleaning of communal areas. Ground rent pays for diddly squat.

I guess there will always be an element of service charges (dread to think what our old flat building would look like if they never had anyone cleaning the corridors :cry: ) - unfortunately in shared living areas I'm sure you'll have a number of people living there with no interest in cleaning/maintaining the building, so it's left to a professional service.
 
Associate
Joined
11 Dec 2008
Posts
1,281
Location
London
Saw this article pop up on my Google feed this morning:


Suggests ground rents will be capped at 250 a year.

Hopefully this passes and becomes law, our recalculation for our ground rent is due in 2027, which i suspect will pass £250. It should help out lots of homeowners who have the doubling ground rent clauses.
I will believe it when I see it...
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,913
Hopefully this passes and becomes law, our recalculation for our ground rent is due in 2027, which i suspect will pass £250. It should help out lots of homeowners who have the doubling ground rent clauses.

Oh, I ought to check mine but it's been fixed at £175 for over a decade so it may well be completely moot for me.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Apr 2007
Posts
11,865
It's a baby step in the right direction, but as said above, there should be much stricter rules on transparency and fairness for management fees...

I mean in some respects, it's appropriate the management company builds up a 'rainey day' fund for big jobs like roof repairs or whatever in the case of a shared building or block of flats, but there should be annual accounts published stating what has been spent on what, what's left over for emergencies, and also clearly stating what the management companies admin charges are.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Posts
12,355
Oh, I ought to check mine but it's been fixed at £175 for over a decade so it may well be completely moot for me.

Ours is recalculated every 15 years. Some calculation involving the RPI, not an obvious calculation, but I remember looking last year when RPI rocketed and if it had been recalculated then it would pretty much have doubled.

Ours is currently £200 a year, so it's some solace to know that regardless of what the next calculation works it out as, it's not going to tip over £250.
 
Soldato
Joined
2 Aug 2004
Posts
7,911
Location
Buckinghamshire
You can set up a RTM company, but it typically requires more than half the leaseholders to sign up to it. There's some instances where you can't setup a RTM, but if they're not applicable to your situation and you have enough leaseholders, the freeholder can't do much about it. Although I believe you must offer a 'board position' to the freeholder.

The challenge is getting enough leaseholders to sign up to it. In my previous property, there were seven of us leaseholders and only two of us were pro-active in trying to improve the service we were getting from the management company. I sent a letter to our freeholder, signed by the seven of us that we wished for the management company to be changed to one I had found, otherwise we'll go down the RTM route. He obliged thankfully, as there definitely wouldn't have been the appetite to implement RTM - even if it's the version of RTM where you employ your own management company rather than managing it yourself.
 
Back
Top Bottom