Football Rule(s) question

It probably falls under unsporting behaviour, since shouting leave it could be seen as an attempt to trick the opponent. Basically any generic call where no indication of who is shouting could be seen as this. I'd expect there to be a certain amount of discretion on the refs side as well.
 
How does that work? Should players only be allowed to run in straight lines?

Feigning injury works as a comparison, stepovers certainly don't.

Stepovers are an attempt to trick an opponent*

In my eyes I dont see the problem with 'MINE' etc, but thats because I believe the game should have a psychological aspect to it.
 
Stepovers are an attempt to trick an opponent*
Yes, with skill. That's the difference.

Where's the skill in calling out to make the defender think twice for that split second, possibly leave it because he thinks you're covering for him, when infact you're an opposing attacker looking to gain from the mistake you just caused? Obviously not every incident will be someone trying to gain an advantage, but they can still be percieved in the same way (And often were). I've even seen one of our strikers pulled up when he actually called his name, he shouted Lee's but the ref obviously thought he shouted 'leave'. (Amazingly enough that is genuinely true and not just something I've made up to back myself up :o).

It's a pretty straight forward rule and for me there's a clear definition between trickery as part of the game itself and unsporting behavious such as this.
 
Can be argued its skill shouting leave, as a team you should know what each other sound like etc, and be on the ball(pun!) enough to have an idea whos covering you and where about any of the other team are around you - a spacial awareness.
Stepover is a skill which exploits often slower opponents with speed and trickery, People like ronaldo play the psychological game, I cant see how this is any different really.
If I should leave and bang a goal in because a defenders left it for me thinking I was one of his team I cant see the problem, because iv got one up on him, just like if Iv done a stepover and megged him, psych'd him out.

Guess its just our different ways of seeing the game, I believe psych-outs should be a part of the game.
Look at ronaldo's penaltys, he does too.
 
But what are we talking about here?

The rules of the game as you think they should be, or the rules of the game as they actually are?
 
I don't see a problem with "shepherding" the ball. Surely if you're in possession you can shield the ball with your body? It'd be the same on any boundary. Isn't an obstruction when you go out of your way to impede the progress of someone when they're in possession?

Are you in possession of the ball even when you haven't touched it though? I agree that shepherding should be allowed but not to the extent that it is now. E.g. Moving around the ball blocking without playing the ball.
 
Last edited:
Well it CAN be classed as 'unsportsmanlike conduct', but is it listed officially anywhere under that section? We're talking about neither I think, since its all interpritation of rules, so I think that SHOULD be the rule in all games, and it shouldnt be penalised, atleast thats how I play, but the actual rules do not clearly stipulate whether it is infact legal or illegal?
 
Shouting 'leave it' to the opposition isn't anything to do with skill. It is deception and can't be viewed in any other way.
Dummys are deception, stepovers are deception.
They are all about as skillfull as each other, and a decent player should have spacial awareness to know whos shouting it.

Think we'll have to agree to disagree with it, its just one of those things.

Its a psych-out, just like Ronaldo running up and stalling during his penaltys, and Grobelaar/Dudek's jelly legs.
 
Well it CAN be classed as 'unsportsmanlike conduct', but is it listed officially anywhere under that section? We're talking about neither I think, since its all interpritation of rules, so I think that SHOULD be the rule in all games, and it shouldnt be penalised, atleast thats how I play, but the actual rules do not clearly stipulate whether it is infact legal or illegal?
It would fall under a blanket rule, but I did say I would expect there to be a certain amount of discretion from the refs.

Anyway, I've played enough games in my time to see it pretty widely enforced.
 
Last edited:
No, I won't agree to disagree on it. You're wrong.

The halting during penalty run-ups wasn't allowed at one time. That should have been kept, but Ronaldo is suffering from using it. Keepers have got wise to him (or he's just a poor penalty taker).
 
It's a bit silly that there would be any type of rule against it. Players shout a lot worse than that during games and if someone falls for it, then it's bigger fool them.

The best example of something similar I can think of was Barthez against West Ham, when he pretended that Di Canio was offside.

It didn't work as Di Canio was wise to it (as you have to be) but had he pulled it off, it would have been extremely clever.
 
Often you'll see players throwing themselves in front of other players. It is blatant obstruction.

See below.

Are you in possession of the ball even when you haven't touched it though? I agree that shepherding should be allowed but not to the extent that it is now. E.g. Moving around the ball blocking without playing the ball.

It's a tricky one I suppose. I think you can be in possession without having touched the ball. When you're already "on the ball" I see no problem with shielding it with your body from someone else. If you were to arrive at the ball at the same time as an opponent and actively cut them off without attempting to play the ball then I'd see it as obstruction.
 
shepherding is fine tbh, its the more muscley/bigger players using their physical attributes, saying you aint aloud to shepherd would mean defenders get skinned none stop by faster forwards, and it ends up being a case of everyone in a team must be lightning fast.
 
Back
Top Bottom