Football *Spoilers* 26/27/28 April
- Thread starter Ripper
- Start date
nah, Ronaldo had eyes for the ball and u could see him trying to get to it. Ballack had his back to it. Would have been a controversial penalty but it was one, especially if you rewind to utd/bolton last season where wiley gave one against vidic for ten times less.
No complaints about the actual penalty though. Silly.
Mountain over a mole hill that. Press were desperate for something to knock Rio after the reports of him being Capello's permanent choice for captain.
If that hadn't have happened they would have just super imposed rio's body into the pictures of the scuffle in the warm down, or gone with "Rio orders United troops to attack groundsmen"
Anyway:
If that hadn't have happened they would have just super imposed rio's body into the pictures of the scuffle in the warm down, or gone with "Rio orders United troops to attack groundsmen"
Anyway:
- Chelsea were the better team and deserved the win
- It was a penalty
- LETS MOVE ON!
Last edited:
Nope, no penalty. Not sure anyone in their right mind honestly believed it was anyway.
Carrick
It's probably code for "Yakubu, shift your arse" or something.
Although that one run where he bossed Reo Coker was impressive.
Although that one run where he bossed Reo Coker was impressive.
Bob Ballacklund had him sweet in a crossface chicken wing. Good job he let go otherwise Ronaldo would have been out for the count.
And if we didn't start like spackers, or lose the games against City, Bolton and West Ham we'd have walked the league.
As far as Arsenal fans go, at least his posts are amusing. Thank god drunkenmaster doesn't make many posts in SA now, I swear he wrote the bible 
Every post was like a new new testament.
Every post was like a new new testament.
Last edited:
No doubt this is your jobs primary tool?
Thought something was wrong. To be fair they really havn't been good at all since xmas but it all depends on what the owner expects from them.