Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 8,920
please lock this thread till the winner is announced
i keep having to come back in only to be disapointed
i keep having to come back in only to be disapointed
please lock this thread till the winner is announced
i keep having to come back in only to be disapointed
+1!!
it wouldnt suprise me if the pile wasnt accurate and they didnt count anything, they probably just took a random believeable number and went with it.
it doesnt need to be the exact ammount because its not possible to count the exact ammount from that picture so no one can complain
it wouldnt suprise me if the pile wasnt accurate and they didnt count anything, they probably just took a random believeable number and went with it.
it doesnt need to be the exact ammount because its not possible to count the exact ammount from that picture so no one can complain
It's a 3D generated image of course they can count the exact amount.
No they can't. Depending on the orientation of the objects depends on the volume the take up.
No what I mean is if the image was generated by a CG programme like Cinema 4D or something then they'd just have plugged in a number into a script to generate that given amount of objects.
No what I mean is if the image was generated by a CG programme like Cinema 4D or something then they'd just have plugged in a number into a script to generate that given amount of objects.
No what I mean is if the image was generated by a CG programme like Cinema 4D or something then they'd just have plugged in a number into a script to generate that given amount of objects.
OcUK are clever folk, they will have probably emptied an entire box, say 2000 per box or whatever then taken a handfull and just counted the ones missing rather than counting the vast amounts!
However could take some searching to find the corrct answer you're right.
To find the winner, could they not just get the values from the sql tables and then order them in excell?