A comment that I've just read on one of the monitor news articles ( cant bleedin well find it now
) anyway the gist of it was that seeing as the AMD solution is truly open, being due to the open standard adaptive sync, but there are only two players in the gamers market, Nvidia and AMD, does that make it just as proprietary as Gsync.
Now although I do understand the point the guy was trying to make, its not really AMD's fault that there is only two players in the market, I mean Intel could step up to the plate and build a decent gaming GPU one day and they would be free to utilise adaptive sync.
Of course this glosses over the whole Adaptive sync is open but freesync is the proprietary AMD hardware/software part anyway side of things, but I thought it was an interesting post by someone commenting on one of the monitor launches.

Now although I do understand the point the guy was trying to make, its not really AMD's fault that there is only two players in the market, I mean Intel could step up to the plate and build a decent gaming GPU one day and they would be free to utilise adaptive sync.
Of course this glosses over the whole Adaptive sync is open but freesync is the proprietary AMD hardware/software part anyway side of things, but I thought it was an interesting post by someone commenting on one of the monitor launches.