Fuel gauge doesnt seem to be doing much

Dogbreath · 12 Aug 2016 at 15:09

Diagro said:
And this is why I don't own an MPS.... shocking fuel use for a car that's only 40 bhp more powerful..

Having an engine that doesn't sound like a taxi and has a useful range of ~5000 RPM or more is a bigger advantage than the extra 40bhp...

RSR · 12 Aug 2016 at 15:25

I get around 150-400 from mine but it normallly doesn't move for the first 50 to 100 miles.

SixTwoSix · 12 Aug 2016 at 17:27

Diagro said:
And this is why I don't own an MPS.... shocking fuel use for a car that's only 40 bhp more powerful..

My daily commute is only 4 miles though. If I had a big commute, it'd be gone.

Diagro · 12 Aug 2016 at 18:39

Dogbreath said:
Having an engine that doesn't sound like a taxi and has a useful range of ~5000 RPM or more is a bigger advantage than the extra 40bhp...

Pfft. Doesn't excuse the terrible fuel use age of it.

Diagro · 12 Aug 2016 at 18:40

Cookeh said:
Your MPG is also pretty trash for a 2 litre tractor...

2.2L tractor! And yes I don't drive slow... if I stick at 60 mph and take it slow I get 50+ easy

Frozennova · 12 Aug 2016 at 18:43

Diagro said:
Pfft. Doesn't excuse the terrible fuel use age of it.

It does though, the area under the curve is far more important useful in the real world than peak figures