FX-6300 and drops

can you explain to me, why would you play on maxed out settings? it gives you only disadvantages against others. it doesnt make any sense

I'm not sure who that's aimed at, but I would say just experiment with settings other than very low to see what happens. The reason being your GPU is probably doing very little work at low res/low settings, which is why your CPU is being so stressed. Increasing the resolution (to the native panel res preferably) and maybe the quality settings will put more load on the GPU and give your CPU a break.

At the very least 16:9 will give you more peripheral vision which is a definite tactical advantage.
 
I'm not sure who that's aimed at, but I would say just experiment with settings other than very low to see what happens. The reason being your GPU is probably doing very little work at low res/low settings, which is why your CPU is being so stressed. Increasing the resolution (to the native panel res preferably) and maybe the quality settings will put more load on the GPU and give your CPU a break.

At the very least 16:9 will give you more peripheral vision which is a definite tactical advantage.

tried that already. doesnt help.

this was aimed to guy, saying that big part of cs community is retarded. 16:9 gives you more vision, thats true, but at the end you get smalled player models.

p.s. i never told that playing with 16:9 is bad. it's player's personal preference. :) all of the resolutions(16:9, 4:3 strech) has their own cons and pros. well except playing with blackbars. but i play cs a for 11 years or so thats what seems most comfortable for me. there is a big reason, why players, who play in a little bit higher level than matchmakings, use lower settings. i dont want to start talking about input lags, response time, motion blur etc. feel free to google it :) cheers
 
Last edited:
How on earth does your graphic settings have any disadvantage to other players!? OP you've been brainwashed by CS:GO monkeys into thinking weird stupid crap like this!

If anything, the higher the resolution the clearer and higher detail everything is, which would be an advantage.
 
how far did you OC? also sounds like if you were find before and they've patched; they've screwed something. Moving your screen rez higher would shift the stress from cpu to gpu. but you're also using the larger models as an advantage.

You've played that long; were you do have a lot of pros starting to move from that rez to higher for better detail without loosing frames
 
How on earth does your graphic settings have any disadvantage to other players!? OP you've been brainwashed by CS:GO monkeys into thinking weird stupid crap like this!

If anything, the higher the resolution the clearer and higher detail everything is, which would be an advantage.

it is not. people strech their 4:3 ar, to get bigger models(usually) or old 1.6 players do it because they're used to that. back in the day, most of people use 640x480 res to get bigger hitboxes on player models. it used to strech along with resolution. thats why some people might use this setting. it might be awp players as well. obvious, your aim will 10/10 times hit a bigger target than a smaller one. i dont want to get deeper in this, because during the years of playing you will probably understand.

higher details causes fps drops, your eye literally gets tons of distractions. for example, disabling(lowering) effect details might turn off things like rain, dust and etc. in the maps. i really dont wanna argue with you guys. you will get this during the years of playing.
 
how far did you OC? also sounds like if you were find before and they've patched; they've screwed something. Moving your screen rez higher would shift the stress from cpu to gpu. but you're also using the larger models as an advantage.

You've played that long; were you do have a lot of pros starting to move from that rez to higher for better detail without loosing frames

yes, you're right! mostly new players, who started few years ago and are talented enough to play in very high level use it. and its a good thing. i personally think that it's time for a change. i'm used to that, so i'm not thinking of chaging my res.

i did told you that playing in high has lots of advantages as well as disadvantages. its just player's personal preference.

i overclocked to 4.5ghz.
 
Give the guy a break guys... Playing at low settings is pretty standard for lots of people trying to play at a high level. There are numerous advantages in terms of response time and silly graphical effects not getting in the way of you telling what is going on.
 
Give the guy a break guys... Playing at low settings is pretty standard for lots of people trying to play at a high level. There are numerous advantages in terms of response time and silly graphical effects not getting in the way of you telling what is going on.

thanks. i already made my mark in cs, i dont need to try anymore :D it's hard to tell people, who have never played older versions of cs, why do people use these res, because most of them play games like cod, gta etc, where higher settings is better and makes you cooler. cheers.
 
yes, you're right! mostly new players, who started few years ago and are talented enough to play in very high level use it. and its a good thing. i personally think that it's time for a change. i'm used to that, so i'm not thinking of chaging my res.

i did told you that playing in high has lots of advantages as well as disadvantages. its just player's personal preference.

i overclocked to 4.5ghz.

hehe not a bad OC; I'd leave it there for now :) and report the bug; I'm almost positive its not just affecting you.....:D
 
i overclocked to 4.5ghz.

So you opened a thread asking if overclocking would help, but you have already tried 4.5? Did it help? What was the point of asking?

If you're this serious about competitive play just swap the mobo and CPU for a last-few-gens i5 tbh.

Re. screen res, you play how you want to, but IMO 4:3 made sense until GO (hitbox scaling particularly), but since GO 16:9 has all the advantages. It's funny how many rounds are lost in pro play because 4:3 cuts the edges off the FOV. Here's another one:

 
So you opened a thread asking if overclocking would help, but you have already tried 4.5? Did it help? What was the point of asking?

If you're this serious about competitive play just swap the mobo and CPU for a last-few-gens i5 tbh.

Re. screen res, you play how you want to, but IMO 4:3 made sense until GO (hitbox scaling particularly), but since GO 16:9 has all the advantages. It's funny how many rounds are lost in pro play because 4:3 cuts the edges off the FOV. Here's another one:


the only thing funny here is your attitude. did you read a single post i wrote or youre just typing anything? does it ****ing hurt you, which resolution i use? i use was it better for me. if you have never played cs with a proper team with a proper default setup, why you're even talking s*it, which you dont obviously know? cmon, im full of your dumb thoughts. i dont wanna argue with you anymore, because you keep saying ridiculous things. cmon dude, play matchmakings and have lots of FUN there with 2k resolution! cheers!!!

i oced my cpu after i made this post :)
 
Last edited:
Give the guy a break guys... Playing at low settings is pretty standard for lots of people trying to play at a high level. There are numerous advantages in terms of response time and silly graphical effects not getting in the way of you telling what is going on.

+1

I haven't played an online multi-player for many months, but I was used to having very high fps, too.
 
the only thing funny here is your attitude...

i oced my cpu after i made this post :)

I'm just trying to share the downsides of 4:3 for those who might not know. When noobs see pros using 4:3 they might think there are real benefits, not just preferences from over 10 years ago.

By the way I have read all your posts. I've played every CS since picking up 1.6 circa 2003, casual and scrims. Why are you so upset that I don't agree with you?

Back on topic, the OC didn't improve FPS?
 
I'm just trying to share the downsides of 4:3 for those who might not know. When noobs see pros using 4:3 they might think there are real benefits, not just preferences from over 10 years ago.

By the way I have read all your posts. I've played every CS since picking up 1.6 circa 2003, casual and scrims. Why are you so upset that I don't agree with you?

Back on topic, the OC didn't improve FPS?

There is no point really trying to help them, they are so locked in there ways thinking low graphics/resolution and old aspect ratio gives them a tactical advantage. Let them have there " tactical advantage " whilst we see the the corner of our 16:9 and have them be completely oblivious to us. ( PS I HATE CS:GO )
 
I'm just trying to share the downsides of 4:3 for those who might not know. When noobs see pros using 4:3 they might think there are real benefits, not just preferences from over 10 years ago.

By the way I have read all your posts. I've played every CS since picking up 1.6 circa 2003, casual and scrims. Why are you so upset that I don't agree with you?

Back on topic, the OC didn't improve FPS?

IM NOT UPSET ABOUT IT! Man did told i agree, that 16:9 is good, i never told it is bad or smth. Most of the pro-gamers use these res, because they're used to it because, biggest part of pro scene is old 1.6 and css players, where lower aspect had advantages. im one of those guys, whole played this game long time before GO release and playing with high res is weird for me. i tried and i cannot get used to it. it feels weird. i just disagree with having high effects, which is total ******** and doesnt make sense.

i have same ~150fps, sometimes it drops to 120. it became little bit more stable.
 
There is no point really trying to help them, they are so locked in there ways thinking low graphics/resolution and old aspect ratio gives them a tactical advantage. Let them have there " tactical advantage " whilst we see the the corner of our 16:9 and have them be completely oblivious to us. ( PS I HATE CS:GO )

it does give, when you strech aspect, and playing with, for example awp, becomes easier. both aspects doesnt give any of advantage against the others. none of them. a proper setup, when playing NOT A ****ING MM GAME makes you surrounded by your teammates, which means that pretty much all of the sides are covered. i won't start explaining you the basics of competitive play, but dude, why you even here if you hate cs? ****ing higher resolution doesnt give any advantage in HIGHER level competitive play. just stop this, im fed up of this.
 
*Ring Ring, Ring Ring* Hello this is Cry11 what is your emergency?

Harry : Hi someone by the name aurimasju needs a wambulance he does not like peoples opinions and facts and is very upset :(

I would love to see the difference between someone playing on a 1024x762 4:3 CRT monitor and someone on a 21:9 Gsync 3440x1440 display. Oh the difference in what you would see in real estate alone.


PS For the reason i don't like CS:GO It's not because it's a bad game. It's because it has a shoddy group of people following it who have appalling attitudes. I have witnessed this firsthand.
 
Last edited:
Let's all keep this reasonable without getting personal.

it does give, when you strech aspect, and playing with, for example awp, becomes easier. both aspects doesnt give any of advantage against the others. none of them. a proper setup, when playing NOT A ****ING MM GAME makes you surrounded by your teammates, which means that pretty much all of the sides are covered. i won't start explaining you the basics of competitive play, but dude, why you even here if you hate cs? ****ing higher resolution doesnt give any advantage in HIGHER level competitive play. just stop this, im fed up of this.

Please calm down. You're overreacting and being needlessly aggressive :)

Some people don't hold the same views as you, rightly or wrongly. Nobody here has said things in such a way to warrant something quite so aggressive in response.
 
old the same views as you, rightly or wrongly. Nobody here has said things in such a way to warrant something quite so aggressive in response.

Counterstrike community though, that's a normal response.

In fact thats the way this entire thread reads now.

I AM PRO, I AM RIGHT, STOP SUGGESTING THINGS.
 
Back
Top Bottom