• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

FX55 to ?

Associate
Joined
28 Jan 2005
Posts
1,472
Location
Too Far from a good woman
I have an FX55 Clawhammer, got it couple of months back impulse buy. Is there any point me going dual core or would i be better of waiting till Christmas and going AM2 ?
Gaming, net and ripping my cd's.
 
Well it depends whether you want to upgrade the rest of your rig and how much you want dual core.
If you are happy to upgrade then consider Conroe although that would be pricey.
If you just want a new CPU then I would advise going Dual Core but it depends whether you often run more than 1 thing at once or use multithreaded apps - if you don't then i wouldnt bother.
If you look to go dual core maybe consider the X2 4400+ at OcUK atm which is good value?
 
Try taking a look at tomshardware, they have a CPU database so you can compare performance between 2 CPUs.
CPU Chart
Edit : Had a look myself and it seems gaming performance may be slightly down altho it depends on the resolution - if at 1600x1200 its unlikely to make too much difference.
 
Last edited:
I've my FX-55 running at 2.8. I did have it at 3ghz, but it was a tad too hot for my liking (on air), so I dropped it back. It is a San Diego core though.
 
deadeyedic30 said:
I have an FX-55 Clawhammer, got it couple of months back impulse buy. Is there any point me going dual core or would i be better of waiting till Christmas and going AM2? Gaming, net and ripping my cd's.
That FX-55 should last ages, if you feel it's a bit slow then overclock the hell out of it. :) There's no point in going dual-core just yet really with a CPU that powerful, wait it out and then go Conroe. ;)
icon14.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom