Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Haha, that sums a couple of posters up perfectly![]()
PGI sent me it and it did make me chuckle and quite apt for some here![]()
If that img was directed at me then it is petty and as expected from the Nvidia lackeys.
Don't cry mate they're only pulling ya ******![]()
It wasn't aimed at anyone in particular but now it has meaning![]()
If that img was directed at me then it is petty and as expected from the Nvidia lackeys.
Get over yourself. you are the latest in a long line before you that appear and disappear. The very fact you use the terminology you do shows what a child you are.
If it is added to the display port standard, won't Nvidia have to adopt it regardless, as it is the "standard"??? I am sure you can't pick and choose what parts of a standard you implement unless you chose not to implement that standard.
Getting left behind over time wont help sales if in 2-3 years you are still on old tech, HDMi 2.0 as an example as I am sure AMD regret that choice. There are those, however small, who are buying Nvidia because of it.
Surely it's better for us and the industry if both technologies continue?
Are we more likely to get innovation and improvements if there's competition?
Would we have Freesync if it wasn't for GSync? Will Freesync and the Adaptive Sync standard continue to improve if there's nothing pushing them to do so?
Ideally we'd want monitors to be able to do both so we're not locked in/out of GPUs, but ultimately more options has to be better doesn't it?
OH the Cavalry has arrived...as old Greg would say..it's time to leave this thread...Have fun