Game 'completion' stats

Define completed? I've finished allot of games over the years but i havent been dragged in by the whole acheivment/trophy scam forcing you to play games again and again.

Ok some of them are quiet fun and everything but do i want to carry a gnome all the way through a game? Do i want to drive on every road on the map? Do i want to blast every pidgeon? I cant be doing with that sort of BS.
 
Id be surprised if Ive downloaded/installed/started 40% of my games let alone finished them...

ps3ud0 :cool:

Huh? Why on earth would you buy so many games and not even start them? The only reason I can think of is not having enough time, but then I wouldn't carry on buying them.

Whenever I get a game, it's only because I plan on playing it as soon as I get home. I won't buy anything else until I've finished it.
 
Most of the games ive bought full price on steam i have completed, there are a few still waiting to be done...but fallout new vegas is out tomorrow so that will take precedence!

i have never completed any of the GTA series, just get a bit bored after a while
 
Heh. I remember at school, it use to be "You completed this?! Played that yet?!"
How times change :)
 
Huh? Why on earth would you buy so many games and not even start them? The only reason I can think of is not having enough time, but then I wouldn't carry on buying them.

Whenever I get a game, it's only because I plan on playing it as soon as I get home. I won't buy anything else until I've finished it.

When a game I know I want to play comes into a sale on Steam, I'm not going to pass it up when it's a low price just because I don't have the time for it. :)
 
I can actually remember the last batch of games I completed.

ME2
Sol Survivor
Ghostbusters
Borderlands
Defense Grid
Mirror's Edge
King's Bounty: The Legend
ME1
Devil May Cry 4
The Witcher
Crysis
 
Yaah I seem to collect them - have a laugh at my Steam page :p. Might be more near 250 than 300 though. I have no justification why I keep buying them, just have no time for games especially when I seem to only play the latest FIFA or something...

ps3ud0 :cool:
 
Last edited:
In my earlier gaming days I can name the amount of games I completed on one hand probably! Even now I'm not great.
 
40% is decent. If you think about there are a whole host reasons players don't complete games:

-They simply haven't got round to to yet (e.g. they may have only bought the game recently or don't have a lot of time for gaming)
-They don't like the game enough
-They got stuck somewhere
-The game was purchased but never played e.g. gift, steam deal or whatever.

On a related note I for the past 6-7 years I've kept a completed.txt file which lists every game I've completed (note 'completed' means beating the main story, not 100%*). The one thing I wish I'd done differently would be to have made a spreadsheet listing the date I completed them. It's got over 100 games on there now which isn't too bad, when I started this list it was part of a concerted effort on my part to actually put some effort into completing games (the previous 5 years I'd only completed around half a dozen games). Bear in mind out 100 games I'd say probably at least 30 probably weren't particularly good games they were just easy/short, quite a few distinctly average FPS games in there, I seem to end up playing them through to the end because there is no learning curve, it's a FPS, you can just pickup and play without having to learn all the game mechanics etc.


*I think this could have a big influence on the stats. e.g. GTA4 only has 35% completion but does that mean fully complete (100%)? If so I'm surprised it is as high as that, I never go for 100% completion in GTA games, I just do all the missions and then the side stuff that interests me (races, schools etc) - really can't be bothered running around collecting packages/horseshoes/pigeons etc.
 
Last edited:
40% is decent. If you think about there are a whole host reasons players don't complete games:

-They simply haven't got round to to yet (e.g. they may have only bought the game recently or don't have a lot of time for gaming)
-They don't like the game enough
-They got stuck somewhere
-The game was purchased but never played e.g. gift, steam deal or whatever.

Well the biggest question is when did they get those stats. If you take em a 3-6 months after launch then you'll probably find the highest completion stats. If you start taking them years afterwards then you'll just be picking up the people who got the game in a sale or something and never really got into it.

I would assume by completed they mean main quest. For most games its not really ambiguous but for open world games it could be a bit more so. There is no way 35% of the people owning GTA4 achieved 100% completion. I'd be surprised if even 3.5% had.

And i really should finish off Bioshock 2 when i get home... i got most of the way through (i assume) then just stopped playing for some reason. I'm normally good at finishing FPS games but RPG and RTS i sometimes stop playing for whatever reason.
 
Well the biggest question is when did they get those stats. If you take em a 3-6 months after launch then you'll probably find the highest completion stats. If you start taking them years afterwards then you'll just be picking up the people who got the game in a sale or something and never really got into it.

Possibly although there are some minor counterbalances e.g. the longer after launch, the more time people have had to complete it, the faster hardware they will have on average (less likely to get annoyed at performance problems), the more patches will have been released for the game (less likely to get annoyed by bugs) etc. I'd agree though that early adopters of a game are probably more likely to complete it in general though because chances are they are really keen on that type of game to have got it straight away and paid full price.

Personally I think the number of hours played is always worth considering alongside this, for example some games I've completed in under 6 hours, yet others I've played 10x as much and not completed (e.g. Oblivion). There is arguably a case to suggest that having 40% of players complete your game isn't necessarily anything to brag about, maybe it just means your game is too short :)
 
Back in the old days (until i was around 18) I used to complete an insane amount of games. I was compulsive infact I remeber I had a book where I listed every game i completed. The most was 131 games on the megadrive. I used to just rent out a game for a few days and box it out. I probably completed around 400 games before i left for university in 1997. Completed a fair few PS1 games but then I got back into PC gaming... I stopped playing single player games properly spending long periods of time playing Planetarion, CS (0.7 or something), civ4 and then world of warcraft and mw2. In that time i have completed very very few games.

Now that I have quit wow and mw2 I am starting to complete games again. Have completed FO3, Starcraft2, HL2, Dirt2, DAO, in recent months. I have a load to get through on steam though!
 
Yes fairly similar story to mine except different timelines. When I went to uni in 1998 I took up playing Quakeworld and from then until late 2003 I completed only a handful of games, I was just playing multiplayer. Online gaming (well.... online anything tbh) is by far the biggest killer when it comes to people completing games IMO. Stuff like WoW or any competitive online game just sucks up most of the gaming time people have.
 
haha i only bought my pc last month and iv got about 10 games, i think i've played maybe 2 lol i install the games and cant be bothered to get used to them or start again so i just go straight back on starcraft where i know where im at and what im doing
 
Back
Top Bottom