GCSE's and National Curriculum Scrapped by 2014.....O levels to replace them

Permabanned
Joined
26 Jun 2010
Posts
0
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/jun/21/michael-gove-scrap-gcse-exams?newsfeed=true

Michael Gove is to scrap GCSE exams as the government accelerates its schools reforms to improve the teaching of core subjects.

Pupils across England will sit GCSEs for the last time in English, maths, physics, chemistry and biology in 2015, paving the way for more traditional exams modelled on the old O-levels the following year.

The education secretary has already scrapped the modular element of GCSEs and his education white paper last November signalled a major reform of the exams introduced by the Conservatives a quarter of a century ago.

But the decision to scrap GCSEs altogether and to revive O-levels, though possibly not the actual name, will be seen as one of the government's boldest reforms.

The move was signalled in an internal education department document leaked to the Daily Mail. The document says: "The Department for Education expects that existing GCSEs will disappear … Those starting GCSEs in 2013 are the last pupils who will have to do them."

The education department refused to comment on leaked documents. But it is understood that there are two broad elements to the reforms: the national curriculum, which sets out what secondary school pupils should be taught, will be scrapped; and a more rigorous exam system will be introduced.

Gove believes it is important to extend to all schools the freedom enjoyed by academies and free schools, which account for half of schools in England. There will also be one exam board for each subject. This means that schools will not be able to sign up for exam boards seen as easier.

Gove believes that the twin reforms will hand freedom to all teachers.

The changes mean that, by 2016, GCSEs will no longer count in league tables. The requirement for five good GCSEs graded A* to C will be scrapped, removing any incentive to study for the exams.

The changes will be introduced in stages. The new exams will be sat in the core subjects of English, maths and the three science subjects from 2016. Gove sketched out the following timetable for the next few academic years:

• The autumn of 2013 will be the last year that pupils will start studying for GCSEs in the core subjects.

• The autumn of 2014 will be the first year that pupils start studying for the new exams in the core subjects.

• The summer of 2015 will be the last time pupils sit GCSEs in the core subjects.

• The summer of 2016 will be the first time pupils sit the new exams.

Gove began his assault on GCSEs soon after taking office, when he ended the modular element. He believes pupils do not learn properly if they are coached to sit exams every term, which they can retake.

He wanted a return to the more traditional way of teaching a subject for two years and then requiring pupils to sit exams at the end of the course.

He told the Andrew Marr Show on BBC1 last June: "The problem that we had is that instead of sitting every part of a GCSE at the end of a course, bits of it were taken along the way. Those bits could be resat. That meant instead of concentrating on teaching and learning you had people who were being trained again and again to clear the hurdle of the examination along the way. That meant that unfortunately less time was being spent developing a deep and rounded knowledge of the subject.

"I think it's a mistake and I think the culture of resits is wrong. I think that what we need to do is make sure, certainly at GCSE, that you have a clear two-year run."

Stephen Twigg, the shadow education secretary, said: "Michael Gove must explain his changes to parents and pupils. Will going back to O-levels for some and CSEs for the rest really improve standards for all? Labour wants to see a robust, rigorous and broad curriculum and exam system that is trusted by parents, pupils and employers. We will set a series of tests to measure these changes.

With no secondary national curriculum how will he ensure a rigorous approach to learning in all schools? When the Tories abolished O-levels and introduced GCSEs in the 1980s they said standards would rise. Now they say they've fallen."

Gove's move comes as influential Tory MP Elizabeth Truss calls for the teaching of maths at core, preparatory or higher level to be compulsory until the age of 18 by 2015. in a report to be published on Thursday tomorrow. Truss said: "The government needs to take urgent action to address the lack of mathematics attainment in schools. Current failings are hampering social mobility and the UK's long term competitiveness. Let's make this year – when we celebrate Turing's centenary – that we start to climb back to the top of the maths table."

Sorry for the post and run, I am on my way out, but I will return later.....

But briefly, The Govt seem to have decided that the GCSE is dead and are planning to replace them with an O level style exam so that 2015 will be the last time children will sit GCSEs.....while I welcome any improvement to the exam system this impacts on my Son as he will be in the last intake to take GCSEs and I am concerned that he will effectively be lumbered with a devalued and ultimately useless set of exam results.......

what say OCuk?
 
Nice.

The whole argument that GCSE's are too easy is a complete load of bull-mess though, I struggled like hell with the pressure and only managed 9 GCSEs of C and above.
 
Nice.

The whole argument that GCSE's are too easy is a complete load of bull-mess though, I struggled like hell with the pressure and only managed 9 GCSEs of C and above.

So because you struggled, it is supposed to be hard ? How about those that found it easy ?
 
I got seven O's at grades 2-5 in 1968, a pass was grade 6 (out of 9). Failed French and art.

Maths
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
English Lang.
English Lit.
Geography

Looking back it was hard work, we took mock exams in the January before and then it was a month or so with usually two papers of 90 mins. to 2 hours per subject in exam conditions in May/June.

Calculators had not been invented for the masses really although close due to the space program etc. but slide rules and mathematical tables were allowed.
 
Last edited:
I am concerned that he will effectively be lumbered with a devalued and ultimately useless set of exam results.......

what say OCuk?

From personal experience (cross comparison between modern GCSE and old O level textbooks), O level stuff is still in the GCSE syllabus but with modular exams, retakes, controlled assessment/coursework. As a result, they only need to learn a module, take the exam and just forget everything right after they come out of the exam hall.

I doubt GCSEs will be devalued, that didn't happen to the old O levels when they were scrapped?
 
I wouldn't worry, I don't think employers will care particularly about it. A level grades and University grades are much more important.
This isn't going to stop students learning for the test, which a lot of these subjects you can do on. The exams are formulaic, so students just do all the past papers and can breeze it.
 
Nice.

The whole argument that GCSE's are too easy is a complete load of bull-mess though, I struggled like hell with the pressure and only managed 9 GCSEs of C and above.
Then you let pressure get to you... I found them a laughing matter, literally..

I didn't do any revision and got good grades (I can't remember what). Always hear stories as well about those getting As without revision..
 
Difficult, I am old enough to have taken O's and A's myself and I know for sure 10 years after I started work employers started noticing that good grades at GCSE didn't seem to indicate good people like O's had.
Same then happened to A's and I am afraid to say even degrees finally.

When I was working at one multinational, in the UK and only in the UK, we needed to start giving basic numeracy and literacy exams to everyone joining the Finance department, people with 2 A*s in these subjects could have terrible maths and english ability.

Back to OP, Castiel in all seriousness its going to be hard to say, there are advantages in seeing the end of these exams, he will receive "understood" teaching to give him good results. The change to the system could be a lottery. Probably a little early to say but whats his likely ambition?
If its Uni then everything else before that becomes redundant to effect, if its only GCSEs then may have more impact, but he can always take the O's the following year at college in spare time in the core subjects if he feels he wants them. I doubt the syllabus will change much at the start.
 
Back in 1974 when I sat my exams O Levels were way tougher than GCSE's and all the thick kids did GCSE's.
During 2008 to 2010 I worked in Education, helped with lots of classes and couldn't believe how easy some GCSE's are.
 
First thing this Government has said that I fully agree with.

I was the last year to do 'O' Levels and already then, 25(?) years ago they were having to cut out the harder aspects of the 'A' Level to cope with the transition.

Having to study and retain information for a main exam is far preferable imo than basing it on course work, where it can be just easily cut and pasted from the internet without any necessity for retention in memory.

One exam board sounds good as well to stop the race to the bottom of competing exam boards and schools choosing the easiest to get higher pass levels.

Also what about having only a fixed % can get an A or B rather than just over a fixed score? So say only 10% of students could get an A, 25% a B but then for a C (a pass) you only need to get over say, 45% marks (the reason being so you aren't enforcing a fail on someone with high marks). The reasoning being it would help smooth out annual variations in complexity of paper and be a relative indication to who are the most academic of that year. Would that work?
 
Maybe those people just listen in lessons and pick up what they're supposed to?

Or are the type of person that can do that without trying. I was fortunate enough to be one of those.

I had to make an effort at A level though, which I guess shows that GCSEs were indeed far too easy.
 
First thing this Government has said that I fully agree with.

I was the last year to do 'O' Levels and already then, 25(?) years ago they were having to cut out the harder aspects of the 'A' Level to cope with the transition.

Having to study and retain information for a main exam is far preferable imo than basing it on course work, where it can be just easily cut and pasted from the internet without any necessity for retention in memory.

One exam board sounds good as well to stop the race to the bottom of competing exam boards and schools choosing the easiest to get higher pass levels.

Also what about having only a fixed % can get an A or B rather than just over a fixed score? So say only 10% of students could get an A, 25% a B but then for a C (a pass) you only need to get over say, 45% marks (the reason being so you aren't enforcing a fail on someone with high marks). The reasoning being it would help smooth out annual variations in complexity of paper and be a relative indication to who are the most academic of that year. Would that work?

They already do this, it's called UMS

Isn't part of the problem today a lack of broad subject knowledge because students are being taught how to pass an exam?

Yes.
 
Back
Top Bottom