Better to have and not need than need and not have surely? Then again I have no idea at what point nukes would be a viable 'need'.
Must admit unless I'm reading it wrong I don't know why it isn't staggered renewal. Spread the cost over years so it's not such a huge hit.
Wages are the same?
Who wants to abolish the monarchy. Something which really is a bit much coming from a foreigner.
Where has the Tories that low? Where are those numbers from?
And the positive polls, from the Tory perspective, would make it possible for them to form a viable government with the support of the Lib Dems and DUP.
I'm voting UKIP...!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where has the Tories that low? Where are those numbers from?
And the positive polls, from the Tory perspective, would make it possible for them to form a viable government with the support of the Lib Dems and DUP.
Oh I agree. It's basically too close to call/it changes day by day. I just find it mildly irritating when partisan people jump on one published snapshot prediction and say, 'aha! see, we're going to win!' or take one poll which makes UKIP look better than the poll of polls and present that as undeniable fact .
Yeah, I agree. This is one of the reasons I like UK Polling Report, despite being produced by YouGov they take an extremely sensible and balanced view of the polls coming in and repeatedly warn against over-interpreting the mildest twitch of the polls.
He got 47.3% of the vote last time - perhaps it's not so unpopular?