Guys pretty lucky that there was no CCTV backing up the 3 waitresses' claims, no surprise one of the resident male feminists in here is still taking the side of the women and spurging out calling other users all sorts. Kind of pathetic really.
You're confusing application of law with real life. Someone stealing bread to live is still a thief, even if I think it's ok under the circumstances.you weren't there, youve no idea what his behaviour was......unless you're allowing someone elses story tell you how to think?
That'll be 7 years transportation for you sir.You're confusing application of law with real life. Someone stealing bread to live is still a thief, even if I think it's ok under the circumstances.
If someone wanted to tell you something that they didn't want anyone to know they would either pull you towards them or pull and lean into you.He grabbed her arm and pulled her towards him.
False equivalents. Pervy behaviour is gross whether it results in rape or not.Do you really think someone grabbing a person's arm is equal to someone being raped or groped?
You seem so appalled by him that I thinks it’s best you go and tell him what he is to his face.False equivalents. Pervy behaviour is gross whether it results in rape or not.
Your the alpha male in my eyes Rob <3You seem so appalled by him that I thinks it’s best you go and tell him what he is to his face.
Please post the video.
I don't see anything pervy in the situation.False equivalents. Pervy behaviour is gross whether it results in rape or not.
Lemme guess, you are 40+ and single?I don't see anything pervy in the situation.
Do you? Pics please.For the weirdos defending this bloke...I hope you don't have daughters, mother's, sisters, aunts or nieces that have to deal with these people.
i'm not confusing anything. i'm simply stating in one post you're telling us no one will tell you what to think but in the next you're thinking is being guided by someone else......bit of a conflict there fella.You're confusing application of law with real life. Someone stealing bread to live is still a thief, even if I think it's ok under the circumstances.
You realise being told what to think, and your thinking being guided, are two different things right?i'm not confusing anything. i'm simply stating in one post you're telling us no one will tell you what to think but in the next you're thinking is being guided by someone else......bit of a conflict there fella.
nothing 'false equivalent' about it. you're just trying to appear cleverer than you are while failing miserably. touching someone of the elbow to get their attention or while leaning over to speak to them is not pervy behaviour, whether you're twisted mind thinks it is or not.False equivalents. Pervy behaviour is gross whether it results in rape or not.
i do and the differences are irrelevant, so again, stop trying to be clever. it's not working.You realise being told what to think, and your thinking being guided, are two different things right?
Read a news article that explains what actually happened versus what was printed on gammon baby newsnothing 'false equivalent' about it. you're just trying to appear cleverer than you are while failing miserably. touching someone of the elbow to get their attention or while leaning over to speak to them is not pervy behaviour, whether you're twisted mind thinks it is or not.
Read a news article that explains what actually happened versus what was printed on gammon baby news
Why are you guys so single track? Whose explained to you (on YouTube probably) that you aren't allowed to think for yourself and a court judgement is the only way to form an opinion? It's really, really odd behaviour.Dunno why we bother with the legal system and evidence because all anyone needs is one of your trusted news articles.
You want to link to a non gammon baby source? Or you want to just keep trying to come across as clever and witty with your pithy replies?Read a news article that explains what actually happened versus what was printed on gammon baby news
Why are you so adamant that what the women claim is actually what happened? Do you have an article that confirms the claims? The evidence reported on (outside he said/she said) is the CCTV and that does not corroborate the claims. Wheres your proof?Why are you guys so single track? Whose explained to you (on YouTube probably) that you aren't allowed to think for yourself and a court judgement is the only way to form an opinion? It's really, really odd behaviour.