Geordie Ex World boxing champ Glenn McRory cleared of three counts of sexual assault

Why are you guys so single track? Whose explained to you (on YouTube probably) that you aren't allowed to think for yourself and a court judgement is the only way to form an opinion? It's really, really odd behaviour.

Bore off with the YouTube stuff. Can you enlighten me with some of your trusted sources?

I might actually come onto your side with things and me and you can go dish out some justice!
 
Lemme guess, you are 40+ and single?
I'm not sure what age or relationship status as to do with it.

I am 40+ and had a few long term relationships i.e. not one night stands.

But surely this is about the intention of the man in this situation.
 
I'm not sure what age or relationship status as to do with it.

I am 40+ and had a few long term relationships i.e. not one night stands.

But surely this is about the intention of the man in this situation.
It's amazing how I was correct. Do you wonder how you're so easily profiled?
 
dlockers choosing a weird hill to die on with this one. It’s an absolute nothing-burger even if you read the story from a “non-gammon” outlet.
 
dlockers choosing a weird hill to die on with this one. It’s an absolute nothing-burger even if you read the story from a “non-gammon” outlet.
I never said it wasn't a nothing burger (it really is, but the gammons are using it to decree victimhood of the male population) but the folk defending his behaviour (if they read it from an outlet that shares what the complaint actually was, rather than belittling it to being called pet) then you'll see it was all a bit deplorable from the get go, legally standing or not.
 
Post 10 links to an article which gives more context. Irrespective of whether he was found guilty of sexual assault, he sounds like a pest on a night out who can't control himself.
It doesn't give more context. It just gives the womans version of events.

It's interesting some of the accusations are accusing McCrory of belittling them, yet the site your referencing is calling them "girls".


A jury unanimously said he was not guilty, yet you who wasn't in the court, are saying they are all wrong?

They came back into court to return unanimous not guilty verdicts on all three counts shortly before 4.30pm.

The trial judge, Mrs Recorder Alexia Power, then discharged the defendant from the dock.

Following an application by defence counsel, Scott Brady KC, Recorder Power agreed Mr McCrory, of Anderson Court, Burnopfield, near Stanley, could be awarded an expenses order from central funds to cover his expenditure during proceedings in the case in London.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't give more context. It just gives the womans version of events.

It's interesting some of the accusations are accusing McCrory of belittling them, yet the site your referencing is calling them "girls".


A jury unanimously said he was not guilty, yet you who wasn't in the court, are saying they are all wrong?
You are confused as to what the courts were tasked to do.
 
Post 10 links to an article which gives more context. Irrespective of whether he was found guilty of sexual assault, he sounds like a pest on a night out who can't control himself.
Yea I’ve read that but i was expecting you to link to something with more than ‘he said’ ‘she said’ in it. Purely because you seem very certain he’s guilty of being a pest who can’t control himself - despite you also claiming this particular case was a nothing burger. If I 100% believed he was a sex pest who couldn’t control themselves I’d not be dismissing this case as a nothing burger.
I’ve not had a look but is there any previous stories or rumours about his behaviour?
 
I never said that at all. You don't know what courts do, do you?
You're going in to the CT area now.

There is nothing deep about this case.

Here is a follow up article from the newspaper you posted and referred to earlier.

 
Back
Top Bottom