Wow, sounds like a massive FIA fail.
They haven't outright banned FRIC, they have just said it "could be challenged" by teams. And the teams have not agreed to postpone the ban.
So that means that running FRIC means you could have your result protested, and it looks like the FIA would uphold those protests, but, with the inevitable FIA delay.
So... If nobody runs FRIC, then were good. However if anyone does run FRIC don't even bother watching the race and wait for the FIA to decide who gets disqualified and who finishes where after all the protests have been lodged and investigated, which should take them no longer than a few weeks...
Just ban it or don't ban it. This middle ground is going to be fascicle!
Edit:
Christ, even the FIA can't agree!
However, with the FIA indicating that it will likely take a 'hands off' approach and not step in to report any outfit running FRIC, the situation will come down to whether or not any team will be willing to protest one of its rivals.
One possible scenario is for an outfit to use the Thursday of the event as a test case for the legality of FRIC - as it is the race stewards who have the ultimate say in the legality of components.
If the concept is ruled illegal, then FRIC suspension could be removed before first practice begins on Friday.
If the stewards disagree with Whiting's view that FRIC is an illegal moveable aerodynamic device, then the way would be left clear for all teams to run it again.
So Charlie thinks its illegal, but doesn't want to muddy his hands with actually stating that (we all know how well it went last time he told a team all was reet
), so he's leaving it to the teams to protest and the stewards to check. But the stewards could overrule him anyway and say its legal?
It sounds like the best approach is to put the car through scrutineering on Thursday with FRIC on, but with a plan for removing it. Then see what the stewards say.