and Perez got nothing
Did Alonso actually leave the track?
Did Alonso actually leave the track?
Williams are still stuck making a car that's very fast in a straight line, because it's easier and cheaper, but only gives benefits on a few tracks. Mercedes and Red Bull before them have proved that you get more benefit across the whole year by making a car that is a little slower at the top end, but much faster in medium corners. Extra downforce in those corners means you get around them faster and get a faster lap.
I think Williams need to change their philosophy because in this day and age, it takes more than a slippery car to win races.
The changes to the car, and the aero / regs are so different next year that Williams could well be a lot stronger than this year.
The Mercedes ability to deal with traffic is far more effected by the driver. Hamilton seems to have no issue.
Checked back. Alonso only just left the track, but was behind Perez and off the racing line as he locked his brakes and ran wide. Perez did nothing more than take the racing line, which he's entitled to do.
There are a lot of external / random factors involved... which is why a lengthy study was conducted to assess this very thing;
http://www.gizmag.com/computer-modelled-top-50-f1-drivers-of-all-time/43147/
That list is utter garbage.
A complete waste of time and money whoever did that tbh.
Wow Romberg..... wow.
Lol... and then he lies on the radio, what a toolbar.
Do either of you have any hard FACTS that dispute that list or are your opinions purely opinions with no hard proof ?
As I pointed out (and you have failed to quote), the list is clearly flawed when a driver who has achieved exactly the same amount of success in F1 that I have, is considered to be the 11th best driver of all time.
Wow...we have a ex formula1 diver in here.
Who are you?