I emailed Overclockers yesterday asking for a status update since it had been 28 days but they haven't replied yet.
I did request a refund today but they haven't replied to that either yet. I understand they could be busy but they were very quick to respond to my RMA emails in December, and it has been 3 days without a reply now.They won't know themselves yet tbh. If you don't want to wait further then request a refund and re-purchase a replacement imo.
Related Reddit threads:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Monitors/comments/ohbc2f/gigabyte_m28u_black_screen_when_switching_apps/
https://old.reddit.com/r/gigabyte/comments/ptubnf/gigabyte_m28u_black_screen_delay_for_34_seconds/
Apparently relating to the DSC implementation onboard. Overriding the refresh rate/colour depth/colour space with 120Hz / 10bpc / YCbCr422 resolves the issue - but it does seem like a bit of a trade off for what is supposed to be a native 144Hz 4K panel.
The firmware F07 firmware was released on the 11th of this month for the M32U
I've updated my monitor and went smoothly, anyone know what it improves?
It could have been bad luck but 3 defective M28U's in a row was getting a bit ridiculous. I got an Odyssey G70A which has the same specs as the M28U but is a bit more expensive, it doesn't have any backlight bleed thankfully. I don't think it matters too much which retailer you buy monitors from, if it has any kind of defect you have the right to reject it and get a refund.That's a shame, I've only really had such issues once with a monitor and I've had a few over the years (not sure exactly how many but 20+) and that was with BenQ. I think it's really just par for the course with TFT panels, it's a shame but it's always been this way and aslong as there is so much variation possible in the tech from the panel and the backlights then I think it always will be, I wouldn't say Gigabyte are necessarily any better or worse than Dell or Asus. This level of variation possible in the final units is also the reason that I, as a rule, always order monitors from that giant river basin in South America despite prefering to use our home grown enthusiast retailers whenever I can, the reason is becasue I can return it for any picky, nerdy reason I like weather they think it's a good one or not, no questions asked and they will send someone to pick it up aswell so it doesn't cost me anything other than time spent with it ...a tough act to follow for a smaller business for sure but also one all will need to for monitors specifically I would say to get my custom. Buying monitors is like rolling a dice to be honest, whatever brand it has on the front.
Well my experience in this has taught me that what I think is a fault isn't necessarily what they will consider a fault, ultimately most will use the manufactuers guidelines for that, where as I think a lot of people involved in the hobby or who just like to have as perfect an image as possible to look at, have a differnt idea about what constitutes a faulty monitor, i.e. a single dead pixel or obvious backlight bleed are not acceptable to many, there is not tolerance for it really where as many manufacturers will allow for it to some degree, having said that if everyone was like this I suspect the prices would need to rise quite a lot as more panels would get scraped and QA would have to be tighter. Where I work we have bought hundreds of Iiyama monitors, mostly the same model a 22 inch IPS basic office display and there is quite a bit of variation if you look at a load of them together, having said that actual dead pixels are surpsingly rare even from large batches like that, then again they are also probably less likely in smaller monitors on the whole I would think.I don't think it matters too much which retailer you buy monitors from, if it has any kind of defect you have the right to reject it and get a refund.
A retailer could try to argue that the defect is within acceptable limits, but ultimately if you consider the defect to be unacceptable then you have the right to return for a refund.Well my experience in this has taught me that what I think is a fault isn't necessarily what they will consider a fault, ultimately most will use the manufactuers guidelines for that, where as I think a lot of people involved in the hobby or who just like to have as perfect an image as possible to look at, have a differnt idea about what constitutes a faulty monitor, i.e. a single dead pixel or obvious backlight bleed are not acceptable to many, there is not tolerance for it really where as many manufacturers will allow for it to some degree, having said that if everyone was like this I suspect the prices would need to rise quite a lot as more panels would get scraped and QA would have to be tighter. Where I work we have bought hundreds of Iiyama monitors, mostly the same model a 22 inch IPS basic office display and there is quite a bit of variation if you look at a load of them together, having said that actual dead pixels are surpsingly rare even from large batches like that, then again they are also probably less likely in smaller monitors on the whole I would think.
True, but who wants to have to argue about it, I just like the ease and no-questions asked nature of what I was originally talking about, as soon as I am put into a possition where I have to argue or justify myself I am already ...annoyed and less inclined to use that retailer again.A retailer could try to argue that the defect is within acceptable limits, but ultimately if you consider the defect to be unacceptable then you have the right to return for a refund.