• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Global Foundries 7NM cancelled - AMD moves all 7NM production to TSMC

Soldato
Joined
26 Sep 2010
Posts
7,157
Location
Stoke-on-Trent
TSMC have Qualcomm, AMD, Apple and Nvidia as customers now, one thing i expect to now see is a lower throughput for AMD on CPU / GPU availability unfortunately, due to the volume of products TSMC is already producing for others.

Money talks. AMD have many more products designed for 7nm compared to Nvidia and Apple, so why would TSMC bump all that production cash in favour of a low-volume customer (Apple) or a non-existent customer (Nvidia)?

If anything we'll see Nvidia get bumped to the back of the 7nm queue as EsaT says above.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Jun 2008
Posts
11,618
Location
Finland
Money talks. AMD have many more products designed for 7nm compared to Nvidia and Apple, so why would TSMC bump all that production cash in favour of a low-volume customer (Apple) or a non-existent customer (Nvidia)?
Apple likely has enough volume to be significant customer even though chip die size is small.
At least they're no doubt one of the first users for TSMC:n 7nm node, because small mobile SoC chips don't need best yields or highest clocks.
So they likely have good production contracts.

Broadcomm is another user of TSMC's 7nm node.
Though this Anandtech news mentions other than mobile SoC customers having become more important for TSMC's plans:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/12677/tsmc-kicks-off-volume-production-of-7nm-chips

Now any late comer without existing good volume deal on 7nm isn't going to have easy time in getting notable chunk of production capacity.


Server CPUs don't need highest clocks, so AMD might well start first making 7nm server CPUs and then little later Ryzen "3", or what ever they'll call it.
In hindsight looks more and more that this situation didn't come as surprise for AMD...
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13122/amd-rome-epyc-cpus-to-be-fabbed-by-tsmc
https://www.anandtech.com/show/12912/amd-zen-2-update-7nm-epyc-in-labs-now-launching-in-2019
 
Associate
Joined
27 Mar 2010
Posts
1,468
Location
Denmark
Pascal started with TSMC making the cards on their 16nm process but later on Samsung Electronics also started producing Pascal GPUs like the GTX 1030/1050/Ti model using their 14nm process.
 
Soldato
Joined
28 May 2007
Posts
18,262
Apple likely has enough volume to be significant customer even though chip die size is small.
At least they're no doubt one of the first users for TSMC:n 7nm node, because small mobile SoC chips don't need best yields or highest clocks.
So they likely have good production contracts.

Broadcomm is another user of TSMC's 7nm node.
Though this Anandtech news mentions other than mobile SoC customers having become more important for TSMC's plans:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/12677/tsmc-kicks-off-volume-production-of-7nm-chips

Now any late comer without existing good volume deal on 7nm isn't going to have easy time in getting notable chunk of production capacity.


Server CPUs don't need highest clocks, so AMD might well start first making 7nm server CPUs and then little later Ryzen "3", or what ever they'll call it.
In hindsight looks more and more that this situation didn't come as surprise for AMD...
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13122/amd-rome-epyc-cpus-to-be-fabbed-by-tsmc
https://www.anandtech.com/show/12912/amd-zen-2-update-7nm-epyc-in-labs-now-launching-in-2019

AMD's CPU numbers alone will be huge.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,662
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
It looks like AMD knew at least as far back as February.

And because of contractual clauses it looks like AMD might have to pay Global Foundries for the privilege of using a foundry other than their none existent 7nm.

 
Permabanned
Joined
2 Sep 2017
Posts
10,490
It looks like AMD knew at least as far back as February.

And because of contractual clauses it looks like AMD might have to pay Global Foundries for the privilege of using a foundry other than their none existent 7nm.

AMD's well-being (and possibly, existence) depends on staying as further away from GlobalFoundries as possible.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
39,320
Location
Ireland
Is global foundries even considered a good fab? I remember back with some of the amd gpu's people saying the GF process had much more leakage than the tsmc process and they would have been better gpu's if they had been done at tsmc rather than gf. Can't recall offhand but i think this was in reference to hawaii and possibly vega.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2009
Posts
13,252
Location
Under the hot sun.
Is global foundries even considered a good fab? I remember back with some of the amd gpu's people saying the GF process had much more leakage than the tsmc process and they would have been better gpu's if they had been done at tsmc rather than gf. Can't recall offhand but i think this was in reference to hawaii and possibly vega.

TSMC makes exclusively the AMD GPUs for years now.
 
Soldato
Joined
11 Oct 2009
Posts
16,591
Location
Greater London
Even then, GF was always falling behind. They had to licence Samsung's 14nm just to stay in the game. 7nm looked they they were finally on track to be finally ahead and competitive against everyone else but that's no longer the case.
 
Back
Top Bottom