Google Stadia cloud gaming services uses AMD custom chip

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

This looks like a big win for AMD:

https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/19/18272809/google-stadia-specs-amd-teraflops-cloud-gaming
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14105/google-announces-stadia-a-game-streaming-service

The custom chip is based on Vega and DF tests the service:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG06H7IQ9Aw&feature=youtu.be
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2019-hands-on-with-google-stream-gdc-2019

Google even appears to be starting its own gaming studio for the service too:
https://techcrunch.com/2019/03/19/google-is-creating-its-own-first-party-game-studio/

 

[Dalandius]

We no longer buy a gaming PC but we rent one it the cloud?

 

[Gregster]

10.7TF isn't that great and then add in latency and it isn't good at all. Not for me but I can see those who can't afford a semi decent PC enjoying this.

 

[Martini1991]

I'd be very surprised if they venture is successful.

But I'm certainly interested. Considering they were talking about 8K and 4K 60HZ I'd have expected more than anything current.

 

[Zefan]

I'd be very surprised if they venture is successful.

But I'm certainly interested. Considering they were talking about 8K and 4K 60HZ I'd have expected more than anything current.

I'm pretty sure the multi-gpu example they showed is the only way they'll be able to offer that sort of performance. It was specifically stated that 8K would be some way down the road.

 

[Martini1991]

I'm pretty sure the multi-gpu example they showed is the only way they'll be able to offer that sort of performance. It was specifically stated that 8K would be some way down the road.

I guess it depends on how long it takes 8K to become mainstream. I can't see the point in it, but the TV's are for some people realistic purchases. Guess it would have been nice for them to have some content.

Like I say, I'm interested in it. I've got a 4K OLED and I know that pushing that with a Vega 64 is only "okay".

 

[Nasher]

Gaming streaming has been tried before and it was awful. It doesn't matter how much processing power is on their end, there is still no way to get around latency issues. We're always going to be limited by how fast you can send a signal down a cable and through multiple hubs/switches along the way.

Streaming a movie is one thing, streaming a fast paced game where input latency is very noticeable is another.

 

[Ezyryder]

Gaming streaming has been tried before and it was awful. It doesn't matter how much processing power is on their end, there is still no way to get around latency issues. We're always going to be limited by how fast you can send a signal down a cable and through multiple hubs/switches along the way.

Streaming a movie is one thing, streaming a fast paced game where input latency is very noticeable is another.

I am not saying that you are wrong but don't you think they would have looked at this before deciding to go ahead with this? I would say let's wait and see to see if it works.

 

[Gerard]

The head of ubisoft a few months back was waffling about "cloud gaming" and how its the way forward. Not having the hardware next to me would feel weird

 

[shankly1985]

 

[Wrinkly]

Console latency with DLSS level graphics does not seem bad if they get the pricing right.

Just my opinion, but AMD didn't take part in the GPU war.

 

[Grim5]

10.7TF isn't that great and then add in latency and it isn't good at all. Not for me but I can see those who can't afford a semi decent PC enjoying this.

At a guess this is going to cost maybe $40 to $50usd per month at least, maybe more if you want the full game library and 4K stream.

I can see the appeal for entry and mid level gamers, buy a new pc or pay $600usd subscription per year

 

[D.P.]

Good job for AMD but I doubt this will be that successful. Latency needs to come down.

 

[Aretak]

I am not saying that you are wrong but don't you think they would have looked at this before deciding to go ahead with this? I would say let's wait and see to see if it works.

Of course they'll have looked at it - and decided that most people have no idea what latency is anyway, and probably won't even notice. When you consider that most people play on consoles at 30fps on HDTVs of varying quality that may or may not be in game mode, they're probably right. Input lag approaching 200ms or more is normal for most people, so they won't have an issue with this. I don't think it's really aimed at PC enthusiasts.

 

[Ezyryder]

Of course they'll have looked at it - and decided that most people have no idea what latency is anyway, and probably won't even notice. When you consider that most people play on consoles at 30fps on HDTVs of varying quality that may or may not be in game mode, they're probably right. Input lag approaching 200ms or more is normal for most people, so they won't have an issue with this. I don't think it's really aimed at PC enthusiasts.

Yes, I don't think they are focusing on the hardcore PC gamer, or even in the hardcore console gamer which owns various devices, but the casual gamers, or those who would like to try it but don't want the expense of buying a device, etc. If it works well I can see it gaining some traction.

 

[Oblivion007]

Linus Tech Tips did a video on this a few months back and it looked a very interesting idea.

 

[Nasher]

Of course they'll have looked at it - and decided that most people have no idea what latency is anyway, and probably won't even notice. When you consider that most people play on consoles at 30fps on HDTVs of varying quality that may or may not be in game mode, they're probably right. Input lag approaching 200ms or more is normal for most people, so they won't have an issue with this. I don't think it's really aimed at PC enthusiasts.

I think even they will notice. It's input lag on top of ping, then the time it takes to be processed and be displayed back on your own monitor.

Plus the picture quality is always degraded no matter how good your connection is.

 

[mid_gen]

It's absolutely not for hardcore gamers....that market is well catered for already.

This is for the non-gamers. The people that have no interest in spending hundreds of dollars on a game console or PC....but if they can just click a button on their Smart TV and try games out, they may get involved.

I've used Steam Link a lot, and used Geforce Now a fair bit. It's not for twitch games sure, but it works fine for most titles. I played AC Origins and Odyssey streaming and they're totally fine. No different to playing on non-Game mode on a smart TV tbh.

 

[wesimmo]

I can see potential issues with FPS type games, but for things like Civilisation and Football Manager where the game can really slow down then cloud based computational power would be a real win.

 

[shankly1985]

It's absolutely not for hardcore gamers....that market is well catered for already.

This is for the non-gamers. The people that have no interest in spending hundreds of dollars on a game console or PC....but if they can just click a button on their Smart TV and try games out, they may get involved.

I've used Steam Link a lot, and used Geforce Now a fair bit. It's not for twitch games sure, but it works fine for most titles. I played AC Origins and Odyssey streaming and they're totally fine. No different to playing on non-Game mode on a smart TV tbh.

This...

Most people here will be commenting with tunnel vision! This is for the people that play games now and then, they dont see gaming has a hobby. The biggest focus here is the pricing has to be spot on! Netflix is like £10 a month this needs to be very close like £15 or something or offer timed play also! Pay £10 for 10 hours play etc