Goooooogle blocks 100,000 search terms for kiddyporn!

McGray said:
Tbf you tried correcting someone on a subject you clearly know nothing about....
Click to expand...

No I just missed out the ? at the end of torrent. But you are the only one that went on a crusade. Using this samsung mobile for posting on ocuk isn’t so much fun... You must be easy to anger at home :p

Anyway im done, carry on as normal ;)
 
FoxEye said:
How in the nine hells are there 100,000 phrases that only paedophiles use?

Guess we better not search for "child", "children", or "get in my van I have free candy" any more :(
Click to expand...

You said the words, you said the words!

You're on the register now sunny jim!

I hope by quoting them I'm not done for too :(
 
Mark A said:
So would that also make owning the many films that have rape scenes in them also a crime? Last house on the left and spit on your grave are two films with fairly brutal rape scenes.
Click to expand...

Well, if it's been passed by the BBFC nothing's going to happen, is it.
 
Mark A said:
So would that also make owning the many films that have rape scenes in them also a crime? Last house on the left and spit on your grave are two films with fairly brutal rape scenes.

I thought prisons were already overcrowded enough as it is without jailing decent people for no reason.
Click to expand...

Irreversible is a pretty epic film with an extremely uncomfortable scene, I wonder how DC woud classify that.

Lysander you are probably right, but how long before DC turns his attention to the film classifiers?
 
Mark A said:
So would that also make owning the many films that have rape scenes in them also a crime? Last house on the left and spit on your grave are two films with fairly brutal rape scenes.

I thought prisons were already overcrowded enough as it is without jailing decent people for no reason.
Click to expand...

This is what a lot of people brought up, what about the original Girl with a dragon tatoo, that has a very brutal rape scene.
 
platypus said:
Irreversible is a pretty epic film with an extremely uncomfortable scene, I wonder how DC woud classify that.

Lysander you are probably right, but how long before DC turns his attention to the film classifiers?
Click to expand...

Mark A said:
I don't know, but how is one fine and the other punishable by 3 years jail time?
Click to expand...

I just wouldn't worry about it, to be honest.

Everything will either be looked on contextually or they'll tell everyone to give up their dodgy films. Either way, no-one's getting their hands on my collection.
 
removed some offending posts - if you boys can't behave and debate without handing out petty little insults then I'll break out the ban hammer.

Now play nice.
 
Caged said:
This will definitely mean that all of those people who get their child porn by searching for "child porn" on Google will be forced to give up their addictions and become valuable members of society.
Click to expand...

Yup, this also worked for blocking of the pirate bay. With Hollywood's billions of dollars in extra revenue i'm happy report our cinema tickets are at an all time low.

MW
 
One thing is for sure, this thread won't turn up on google, or if it does, you're going straight to jail for searching it..
 
Rhodri said:
But now this system is in place, what's the betting search terms not related to the original issue gradually get added in years to come?
Click to expand...

This. We've already seen it with cigarettes (first ban advertising, then smoking in pubs, then plain packaging, then hiding them at counters etc) and now BRAKE aren't happy with the recent mobile phone & driving laws and want to extend the ban to handsfree kits too.

They start off by banning something small or something most agree with, and once that principle is in place they slowly extend the ban and its remit over time.
 
estebanrey said:
This. We've already seen it with cigarettes (first ban advertising, then smoking in pubs, then plain packaging, then hiding them at counters etc) and now BRAKE aren't happy with the recent mobile phone & driving laws and want to extend the ban to handsfree kits too.

They start off by banning something small or something most agree with, and once that principle is in place they slowly extend the ban and its remit over time.
Click to expand...
White the FITD technique does work, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot-in-the-door_technique - it's worth being cautious of avoiding the slippery slope fallacy.

Positive or negative changes usually occur in small steps, really each suggestion has to be judged on it's merit alone (ignoring any potential future suggestions, as they will exist to move forwards or backwards in any field).
 
LiE said:
One thing is for sure, this thread won't turn up on google, or if it does, you're going straight to jail for searching it..
Click to expand...

67vu.jpg


Got my "get out of jail" card :p
 
Mark A said:
So would that also make owning the many films that have rape scenes in them also a crime? Last house on the left and spit on your grave are two films with fairly brutal rape scenes.

I thought prisons were already overcrowded enough as it is without jailing decent people for no reason.
Click to expand...

No, that makes no sense. Those films you've mentioned aren't pornography, they're films.
Just because it depicts a rape doesn't mean it's porn, it'd be the same for Irreversible which I imagine has a far nastier rape scene than the ones above
 
Gilly said:
'Safe'?

Only inasmuch as terrorists hiding amongst the general public are 'safe'. It's a worrying way to word something that appears innocent at first.
Click to expand...

Are you suggesting tor is a scary terrorist community?

I mean safe as in how private it is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom